hi,
Am Freitag, den 15.04.2016, 08:02 +0200 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Hello Sebastien,
>
> Sebastien Bacher [2016-04-14 15:16 -0600]:
> > On the location based option you wrote that it creates issues when you
> > connect e.g an usb dongle to another port, but then you commented that it
> > doesn't ma
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Martin Pitt [2016-04-06 12:56 +0200]:
> > * MAC based (status quo): Emphasize the identity of the device that
> >you connect
> >+ Works well on PCs/laptops where you want to connect your phone or
> > USB 3G stick on an arbitrary
Hello Sebastien,
Sebastien Bacher [2016-04-14 15:16 -0600]:
> On the location based option you wrote that it creates issues when you
> connect e.g an usb dongle to another port, but then you commented that it
> doesn't matter because nm handles it fine. Do we know of any case which
> wouldn't work
Hey Martin,
Le 14/04/2016 03:50, Martin Pitt a écrit :
So we got one vote from Aaron in favor of moving to location-based,
and some further analysis from Steve (who didn't seem to like
location-based much), so not a clear direction here. Which probably
means to keep the status quo for 16.04 fina
Martin Pitt [2016-04-06 12:56 +0200]:
> * MAC based (status quo): Emphasize the identity of the device that
>you connect
>+ Works well on PCs/laptops where you want to connect your phone or
> USB 3G stick on an arbitrary USB slot.
>
>- With boards like the RasPi you usually think
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> last summer we discussed changing the way network interface names are
> named [1]. For the most part I think this worked out well, but I've
> heard some complaints here and there about USB devices, we had some
> ad-hoc discussions
Hi Martin,
$.02:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:56:44PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> However, as there were some complaints [2][3] about location-based
> names not being appropriate for USB devices, we currently use the MAC
> address for those. I. e. they are named like "enx123456AABBCC".
> After hav
Hello all,
last summer we discussed changing the way network interface names are
named [1]. For the most part I think this worked out well, but I've
heard some complaints here and there about USB devices, we had some
ad-hoc discussions, but they weren't concluded. So let's review this
before we re
