Re: Call for testing: new udev -- switch to vendor/name/slot based net interface names?

2013-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:53:22PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Stéphane Graber [2013-05-14 15:44 -0400]: > > So I'd much prefer we stick to something that's been working rather well > > for all these years and let other people do the experiments with that stuff. > Fair enough. I forward-ported the

Re: Call for testing: new udev -- switch to vendor/name/slot based net interface names?

2013-05-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Stéphane Graber [2013-05-14 15:44 -0400]: > So I'd much prefer we stick to something that's been working rather well > for all these years and let other people do the experiments with that stuff. Fair enough. I forward-ported the old rules generators to the current 202 package. I tested it in a VM

Re: Call for testing: new udev -- switch to vendor/name/slot based net interface names?

2013-05-14 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 05/13/2013 04:23 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello fellow Ubuntuers, > > now that we have logind/uaccess and libudev1 in Ubuntu, it is finally > time to update to a current udev version. This will bring a faster > system boot as it does not call the modprobe, scsi_id, blkid and other > programs a

Call for testing: new udev -- switch to vendor/name/slot based net interface names?

2013-05-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello fellow Ubuntuers, now that we have logind/uaccess and libudev1 in Ubuntu, it is finally time to update to a current udev version. This will bring a faster system boot as it does not call the modprobe, scsi_id, blkid and other programs a gazillion times, but instead has all these built in (th