On 2025-07-16 16:19, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> On 12.06.25 14:27, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 05:10:44PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>>> I am a little late to the party.
>>
>> Way later here :)
>
> I just discussed this with some people at DebConf in the context of
> rust-hwlib,
On 12.06.25 14:27, Athos Ribeiro wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 05:10:44PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I am a little late to the party.
Way later here :)
I just discussed this with some people at DebConf in the context of rust-hwlib,
which is another Ubuntu-native package. I guess the gener
Hi,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 05:10:44PM +, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
I am a little late to the party.
Way later here :)
On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 11:49 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:29 AM Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, R
Hi,
I am a little late to the party.
On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 11:49 +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:29 AM Julian Andres Klode
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the vers
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> I've prepared a - not necessarily complete - conversion of this
> discussion to a PR [3].
Thanks - this is great!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:29 AM Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
> > which automatically stops autosync, which is probably what we want.
> >
> > Other such Ubuntu-o
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 02:55:46PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
> which automatically stops autosync, which is probably what we want.
>
> Other such Ubuntu-only packages do not, so if Debian were to package
> something with the
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:46 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > I've prepared a - not necessarily complete - conversion of this
> > discussion to a PR [3].
>
> Thanks - this is great!
Already polished for the feedback of Sally - thanks
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 07:02:06AM +, Simon Quigley wrote:
> I can think of one specific case where an exception to the rule would be
> warranted, and it is somewhat rare.
>
> Sometimes, we need to introduce a brand-new source package late in a cycle,
> for a good reason. Take the extreme ca
Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
which automatically stops autosync, which is probably what we want.
Other such Ubuntu-only packages do not, so if Debian were to package
something with the same source package name, it may autosync, which is
probably not what
Hi Robie!
Firstly, thank you for driving this! This is also something that has been on my
mind this cycle.
Responses inline.
On 4/2/25 08:55 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
Some packages that are Ubuntu-only have `ubuntu` in the version string,
which automatically stops autosync, which is probably wha
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 12:14 AM Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 02:56, Robie Basak wrote:
>>
>>
>> Could we agree that all Ubuntu-only packages SHOULD always contain
>> `ubuntu` in their version string (this would usually be -0ubuntuX or
>> 0ubuntuX[1] if native) then, so th
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 02:56, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> Could we agree that all Ubuntu-only packages SHOULD always contain
> `ubuntu` in their version string (this would usually be -0ubuntuX or
> 0ubuntuX[1] if native) then, so that we don't have to think about it?
>
I think this definitely makes se
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 11:09:32AM -0300, Renan Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to
> comply.
Yes - I'm far less worried about ubuntu-advantage-tools - it seems
unlikely that would get added to Debian, given what it is :)
But having
Hmmm looking at `ubuntu-advantage-tools`; we use a very simplified version
string, and it's highly unlikely that Debian will ship some
`ubuntu-advantage-tools` isn't it?
However, it does not hurt us to add the suffix in the next release, just to
comply.
[]s
Renan
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:56 AM R
15 matches
Mail list logo
