Re: LFS_CFLAGS on 32bits architectures

2022-06-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 8:29 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:16:59PM +, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > I experimented a few things, and this got it building again: > > --- a/debian/rules > > +++ b/debian/rules > > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ export

Re: LFS_CFLAGS on 32bits architectures

2022-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Andreas, On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:16:59PM +, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > on a pi3 (armhf): > $ getconf LFS_CFLAGS > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > This only returns a value where it's needed, aka, 32bits (AFAIK). > Shouldn't this be part of our default set of CFLAGS on

LFS_CFLAGS on 32bits architectures

2022-05-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, on a pi3 (armhf): $ getconf LFS_CFLAGS -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 This only returns a value where it's needed, aka, 32bits (AFAIK). Shouldn't this be part of our default set of CFLAGS on 32bits architectures? The reason I ask is this old samba bug[1] ("64bits prototype not