On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:12:00AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] "Cody A.W. Somerville"
> | I don't understand how the inclusion of the chanelog has anything to do with
> | compliance of that section of the gpl for files other than the changelog its
> | self. That section is specifying that
]] "Cody A.W. Somerville"
| I don't understand how the inclusion of the chanelog has anything to do with
| compliance of that section of the gpl for files other than the changelog its
| self. That section is specifying that if you edit a file you must ensure you
| include a notice in the file tha
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:45 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Martin Pitt
> >
> > | Tollef Fog Heen [2010-11-14 22:20 +0100]:
> > | > ]] Martin Pitt
> > | > This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a):
> > | >
> > | > a) Yo
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:45 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Martin Pitt
>
> | Tollef Fog Heen [2010-11-14 22:20 +0100]:
> | > ]] Martin Pitt
> | > This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a):
> | >
> | > a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
> | >
]] Martin Pitt
| Tollef Fog Heen [2010-11-14 22:20 +0100]:
| > ]] Martin Pitt
| > This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a):
| >
| > a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
| > stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
| >
| >
Tollef Fog Heen [2010-11-14 22:20 +0100]:
> ]] Martin Pitt
> This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a):
>
> a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
> stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
>
> Has anybody looked into that or
On Sunday, November 14, 2010 04:32:07 pm Luke Faraone wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 04:20 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a):
> > a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
> > stating that you changed the files and the date
On 11/14/2010 04:20 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> This looks like a violation of the GPL (v2 at least) 2a):
>
> a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
> stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
But the source package will still contain unmodif
]] Martin Pitt
| However, there were some concerns [3], so we got a new compromise to
| just ship the top 10 changelog records, and add a comment about
| apt-changelog at the bottom. That way, the most interesting entries
| are still shipped, and developers and users will get used to
| "apt-chang
