On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 02:21:57 AM Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 15.04.2011 23:36, Scott Moser wrote:
> > I did make some progress. One overall theme I see is that there are
> > things in that queue that should not be there. That means that
> > patch-pilots (or anyone using it, really) potentiall
On 15.04.2011 23:36, Scott Moser wrote:
> I did make some progress. One overall theme I see is that there are
> things in that queue that should not be there. That means that
> patch-pilots (or anyone using it, really) potentially lose time reading
> bugs and coming to the conclusion that "this i
On Apr 15, 2011, at 04:36 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
>== merges need/needed to be marked accepted ==
>* lp:~barry/ubuntu/natty/pyopenssl/bug-758037
> http://pad.lv/758037
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~barry/ubuntu/natty/pyopenssl/bug-758037/+merge/57494
> merge proposal has been accepted. this n
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
[...]
> * lp:~mathieu-tl/geoclue/lp738584
> The link in the sponsorship page is bad for this:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~mathieu-tl/geoclue/lp738584/+merge/56980
> it gives 404.
This is my fault, sorry. I noticed my merge request was inc
I did make some progress. One overall theme I see is that there are
things in that queue that should not be there. That means that
patch-pilots (or anyone using it, really) potentially lose time reading
bugs and coming to the conclusion that "this is not ready".
I'm not a member of ubuntu-sponso
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sea-defender/+bug/745876
- turned into a sync request, 0.9-2 has the FTBFS fix in it
https://code.launchpad.net/~mathieu-tl/ubuntu/natty/openwsman/lp760835/+merge/57790
- test-built, and uploaded to natty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ucarp
