I tested
https://cdimages.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mini-iso/daily-live/current/lunar-mini-iso-amd64.iso
and it currently displays Ubuntu Desktop and Server 22.04.2 and 22.10
I believe it currently loads releases from
https://releases.ubuntu.com/streams/v1/ so it will automatically
include 23.04 once it
On 2/24/23 11:51, Dan Bungert wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
I've seen more than one person annoyed by the fact that the mini.iso
netinstaller is no more.
The "flavor" would be able to be held in a
very small ISO file (preferably CD sized), and it would download and
Huh. TIL. That's awesome.
On 2/24/23 14:33, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:20:25PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
This makes good sense to me. The concern I'm noticing here is that Secure
Boot activates a kernel lockdown mode that prohibits kexec.
Incorrect. It disables the
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:20:25PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> This makes good sense to me. The concern I'm noticing here is that Secure
> Boot activates a kernel lockdown mode that prohibits kexec.
Incorrect. It disables the old kexec syscall which doesn't have an
interface for doing
Secureboot allows kexec, when using the recentish kexec_file_load syscall
which performs kernel image signature verification.
All of this just works under secureboot.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, 20:20 Aaron Rainbolt, wrote:
>
> On 2/24/23 11:51, Dan Bungert wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54,
On 2/24/23 11:51, Dan Bungert wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
I've seen more than one person annoyed by the fact that the mini.iso
netinstaller is no more.
The "flavor" would be able to be held in a
very small ISO file (preferably CD sized), and it would download
Hi Aaron,
Łukasz and Dan have covered the details of the work in progress, so just a
couple of notes:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 09:53:16PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> My idea is to either write my own installer or use a customized version of
> the existing Debian installer, and package it into
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 04:54, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> > > I've seen more than one person annoyed by the fact that the mini.iso
> > > netinstaller is no more.
> > > The "flavor" would be able to be held in a
> > > very small ISO file (preferably CD sized), and it would download and
> > >
On 2/24/23 02:55, Lukasz Zemczak wrote:
Hey Aaron!
Actually, this is the one thing that sucks when we don't publish our
team's roadmaps to the public (which I'm trying our team to start
doing, but it's so busy recently that we didn't manage to yet): there
is work ongoing on something like this
Hey Aaron!
Actually, this is the one thing that sucks when we don't publish our
team's roadmaps to the public (which I'm trying our team to start
doing, but it's so busy recently that we didn't manage to yet): there
is work ongoing on something like this - and actually this cycle!
The MPs for
Forwarding my response to Ubuntu devel list as I see my response going as
blank on the list.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Bhavani Shankar R
Date: Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:32
Subject: Re: Possibility of accepting a network-based installer of Ubuntu
as an official flavor?
To: Aaron
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 04:54 Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> Note, I'm asking this *very* early. I don't have the project I have in
> mind even started yet. I'm not even sure what I want to name this
> project. This is more of a "testing the waters" to see if this kind of
> thing is even a possibility
Note, I'm asking this *very* early. I don't have the project I have in
mind even started yet. I'm not even sure what I want to name this
project. This is more of a "testing the waters" to see if this kind of
thing is even a possibility before getting started.
I've seen more than one person
13 matches
Mail list logo
