Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-07-18 Thread Cláudio Sampaio
Doesn't i.MX6Q which comes in the UDOO Quad support FULL OpenGL? That's what they said in their announcement: http://www.udoo.org/udoo-supports-full-opengl-hardware-acceleration/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > hey Matthias, > after reading the bug,

Re: Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-07-18 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2016-06-06 5:23 GMT+03:00 张超 : > Hi All， > We have ARM64 devices used AMD Radeon Series graphics cards。So，same as x86 > we really need a full OpenGL Qt support With ARM64 。 Hi. I noticed this e-mail went unanswered. All Radeon graphics (and NVIDIA) run OpenGL ES

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 02:00:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > There are two ways to make a GLES-enabled Qt stack available on arm64; the > > armhf way (build Qt exclusively for GLES), or the x86 way (build alternative > > stacks for both GL and GLES). > > Which we should pursue depends on

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04.06.2016 00:25, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:56:14PM -0500, Kevin Gunn wrote: >>> Ubuntu supports a growing number of ARM servers that have PCIe slots, >>> so external GPUs can be added. CUDA is supported on those platforms >>> upstream: >>>

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:56:14PM -0500, Kevin Gunn wrote: > > Ubuntu supports a growing number of ARM servers that have PCIe slots, > > so external GPUs can be added. CUDA is supported on those platforms > > upstream: > > https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-toolkit-65 > > And I do know there are

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Dann Frazier
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:03:53PM -0600, Dann Frazier wrote: >> [ Reorganized to use inline replies ] >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Kevin Gunn
On Friday, June 3, 2016, Dann Frazier wrote: > [ Reorganized to use inline replies ] > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose >

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:03:53PM -0600, Dann Frazier wrote: > [ Reorganized to use inline replies ] > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> LP: #1586026 asks for the removal

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Dann Frazier
[ Reorganized to use inline replies ] On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> LP: #1586026 asks for the removal of binary packages on arm64 which cannot >> be >> built with OpenGL

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Kevin Gunn
hey Matthias, after reading the bug, it's implied the binaries being asked for removal were somehow built with gl (possibly sw implementation of gl?)please cmiiaw as to the request, never say never, but at least i've never seen an arm chipset in the wild with a gl enabled gpu (like the bug