Hi Steve,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:46:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> > 1) What package name and version string was tested (saying "the one from
> > xenial-proposed" isn't enough for me, as this is where we see things
> > going w
On 21 April 2017 at 00:46, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Robie,
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
>> 1) What package name and version string was tested (saying "the one from
>> xenial-proposed" isn't enough for me, as this is where we see things
>> going wrong as that v
Hi Robie,
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> 1) What package name and version string was tested (saying "the one from
> xenial-proposed" isn't enough for me, as this is where we see things
> going wrong as that version can change).
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:39:07PM +0
Le 20/04/2017 à 15:39, Robie Basak a écrit :
> So I'll JFDI and edit
> everything for clarity, including the wiki
Sounds good to me, thanks Robie!
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:28:39PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> requirement ... and indeed it's not in the wiki. So we have at least one
> example where something checked the wiki documentation as a reference,
> wiki also is easy enough to edit so there is no real reason to not do it.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Il 22/03/2017 02:25, Robie Basak ha scritto:
> 1) "Regression Potential"
>
> "Regression Potential" is supposed to describe:
>
> ...how regressions are most likely to manifest, or may manifest
> even if it is unlikely, as a result of this change.
Hey Robie,
Thanks for pushing for those process improvements.
Le 20/04/2017 à 14:36, Robie Basak a écrit :
> Do you think people would look at the wiki
Some people are probably going to, and if we have documentation it
should reflect our current practices otherwise we better just delete it
or re
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 06:39:15PM +0800, Marco Trevisan wrote:
> Il 22/03/2017 02:25, Robie Basak ha scritto:
> > 1) "Regression Potential"
> >
> > "Regression Potential" is supposed to describe:
> >
> > ...how regressions are most likely to manifest, or may manifest
> > even if it is unlikely,
Hi Mathieu,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:17:29PM -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> > "Regression Potential" is supposed to describe:
> >
> > ...how regressions are most likely to manifest, or may manifest
> > even if it is unlikely, as a result of this change. It is
> > assumed tha
On 2017-03-21 02:25 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
[...]
> 1) "Regression Potential"
>
> "Regression Potential" is supposed to describe:
>
> ...how regressions are most likely to manifest, or may manifest
> even if it is unlikely, as a result of this change. It is
> assumed that any SRU c
I'm fairly new to ~ubuntu-sru, and I noticed a couple of things that I
think we could do better in terms of preventing SRU regressions:
1) Actual consideration of how regressions might manifest in "Regression
Potential" paperwork.
2) A description of what was actually tested when marking
"verific
11 matches
Mail list logo