Hi All,
Thank you for your reviews and recommendations.
We will go with option (3).
Launchpad bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1961542
Debdiff:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/587119305/lp1961542_jammy.debdiff
mwh has helped sponsor the upload to jammy-proposed,
I too vote for (3). I think (2) would be the next least-bad option but
given the fundamental-ness of util-linux I think it's better to be safe.
Cheers,
mwh
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 02:43, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Bryce Harrington wrote on 18/02/2022:
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300,
Bryce Harrington wrote on 18/02/2022:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm looking for a bit of advice about landing a new feature in util-linux, as
>> things have gotten a little complicated, and with feature freeze looming, a
>> second opinion
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:18 AM Bryce Harrington
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> > 3) Revert the single patch which caused all of this,
> > 58b510e580 libsmartcols: sanitize variable names on export output
> > which is a tidier and well tested
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a bit of advice about landing a new feature in util-linux, as
> things have gotten a little complicated, and with feature freeze looming, a
> second opinion would be much appreciated.
>
> e.g. lsblk -P
Hi all,
I'm looking for a bit of advice about landing a new feature in util-linux, as
things have gotten a little complicated, and with feature freeze looming, a
second opinion would be much appreciated.
util-linux 2.37.2 in Jammy has introduced some new behaviour for lsblk and
similar tools
