Re: StableReleaseUpdates page (Was: Re: Fw: [scite] Fixed Lua dynamic library loading in Ubuntu 18.04 proposed updates)

2019-08-27 Thread Lukasz Zemczak
The wiki page in the paragraph regarding SRU testing might indeed not be entirely realistic, but it is the *recommended* way of going forward. With my SRU hat on, I personally would never reject someone's SRU verification just because the person performing it was the uploader. Sure, bonus points if

Re: StableReleaseUpdates page (Was: Re: Fw: [scite] Fixed Lua dynamic library loading in Ubuntu 18.04 proposed updates)

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:26:15PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:05:15PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > - I've uploaded quite a few SRUs by now, and maybe a handful have been > > (partially) > > verified by someone else. Partially because these people only test th

Re: StableReleaseUpdates page (Was: Re: Fw: [scite] Fixed Lua dynamic library loading in Ubuntu 18.04 proposed updates)

2019-08-19 Thread Robie Basak
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:05:15PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > - I've uploaded quite a few SRUs by now, and maybe a handful have been > (partially) > verified by someone else. Partially because these people only test their > favorite release (and then forget to do some tagging changes,

StableReleaseUpdates page (Was: Re: Fw: [scite] Fixed Lua dynamic library loading in Ubuntu 18.04 proposed updates)

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:34:07AM -0700, Bryan Quigley wrote: > Nope, that's not the standard, expected procedure. It is always better to > have someone else verify a fix, it's sometimes not feasible though. > > "While not ideal it is also possible for the uploader of the fix to perform > the ve