The wiki page in the paragraph regarding SRU testing might indeed not
be entirely realistic, but it is the *recommended* way of going
forward. With my SRU hat on, I personally would never reject someone's
SRU verification just because the person performing it was the
uploader. Sure, bonus points if
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:26:15PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:05:15PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > - I've uploaded quite a few SRUs by now, and maybe a handful have been
> > (partially)
> > verified by someone else. Partially because these people only test th
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:05:15PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> - I've uploaded quite a few SRUs by now, and maybe a handful have been
> (partially)
> verified by someone else. Partially because these people only test their
> favorite release (and then forget to do some tagging changes,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:34:07AM -0700, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> Nope, that's not the standard, expected procedure. It is always better to
> have someone else verify a fix, it's sometimes not feasible though.
>
> "While not ideal it is also possible for the uploader of the fix to perform
> the ve
