On 2012-08-09 09:48:58 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 08/08/2012 22:41, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> >I don't think this should be synced without doing a full test rebuild of the
> >archive (main+universe) using the new version.
> Who can do archive rebuilds on ppas (I guess there is an easy way
Le 08/08/2012 22:41, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I don't think this should be synced without doing a full test rebuild of the
archive (main+universe) using the new version.
Who can do archive rebuilds on ppas (I guess there is an easy way that
scripting a get and put for every single source)? Can w
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2012, 22:09 +0200 schrieb Sebastien Bacher:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm unsure who to ask for feedback so I'm emailing that list.
>
> Is there anyone having an objection syncing make 2.82 [1] from Debian
> experimental?
> - the version is out of over 2 years
> - it's in fedora
Hi Seb,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:09:00PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I'm unsure who to ask for feedback so I'm emailing that list.
> Is there anyone having an objection syncing make 2.82 [1] from
> Debian experimental?
> - the version is out of over 2 years
> - it's in fed
Hey everyone,
I'm unsure who to ask for feedback so I'm emailing that list.
Is there anyone having an objection syncing make 2.82 [1] from Debian
experimental?
- the version is out of over 2 years
- it's in fedora for about 2 years
- it's in Debian experimental for a year
The new version fixe