UDD vs. non-UDD for merging (was: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide)

2012-12-18 Thread Emmet Hikory
Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:33:18PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: It only works better if you are using UDD. I agree that if your primary workflow is UDD based, then UDD branches are better. If I get a branch it's as useless for me as a debdiff is for you. When asked

Re: UDD vs. non-UDD for merging (was: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide)

2012-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 01:02:21 PM Emmet Hikory wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:33:18PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: It only works better if you are using UDD. I agree that if your primary workflow is UDD based, then UDD branches are better. If I get a

Re: UDD vs. non-UDD for merging (was: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide)

2012-12-18 Thread Emmet Hikory
Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 01:02:21 PM Emmet Hikory wrote: Is it not the case that if one prefers UDD, one can just pull the current Debian import from launchpad, apply the diff proposed by the candidate, run debcommit, and end up with a branch with all the

Re: UDD vs. non-UDD for merging (was: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide)

2012-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 02:02:58 PM Emmet Hikory wrote: Scott Kitterman wrote: On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 01:02:21 PM Emmet Hikory wrote: Is it not the case that if one prefers UDD, one can just pull the current Debian import from launchpad, apply the diff proposed by