Hi Eric,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:52:43AM -0400, Eric Desrochers wrote:
> By any chance, do you guys know when my "SRU Developer" privileges will be
> effective ?
This is waiting for the technical board to change the ACL. See the
technical-board list archive for details.
Robie
signature.asc
Hi,
By any chance, do you guys know when my "SRU Developer" privileges will be
effective ?
Regards,
Eric
On 2017-03-20 01:48 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:32:38AM -0500, Eric Desrochers wrote:
>> Yes, I'll prepare my application for the sru-uploader team for the next DMB
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:32:38AM -0500, Eric Desrochers wrote:
> Yes, I'll prepare my application for the sru-uploader team for the next DMB
> meeting.
The DMB considered Eric's application on 13 March and I'm pleased to
report that it was successful with a unanimous vote.
Eric is the first me
On 2017-02-28 07:57 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:09:12PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
>> Thank you for the discussion on this. I propose to go ahead and add a
>> new ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders team that can upload to any main or universe
>> package in any stable release in the usual
Hello,
Le 28/02/2017 à 13:57, Robie Basak a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:09:12PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
>> Thank you for the discussion on this. I propose to go ahead and add a
>> new ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders team that can upload to any main or universe
>> package in any stable release in
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:09:12PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> Thank you for the discussion on this. I propose to go ahead and add a
> new ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders team that can upload to any main or universe
> package in any stable release in the usual way, but not to the
> development release. The t
Thank you for the discussion on this. I propose to go ahead and add a
new ~ubuntu-sru-uploaders team that can upload to any main or universe
package in any stable release in the usual way, but not to the
development release. The team would owned and managed by the DMB through
the usual application
Hello,
Le 02/02/2017 à 08:09, Robie Basak a écrit :
> I'm writing to ubuntu-devel with my DMB hat because I'd like to hear the
> opinions of existing Ubuntu developers.
>
> Eric and Dave both work for STS - Sustaining Engineering (L3 support), a
> department within Canonical. They've both applied
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:41:02AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I don't think that we've seen there be an (unspoken
> > or otherwise) requirement for MOTU as a prequisite for core-dev for a
> > long time now.
>
> I haven't seen any evidence of an (unspoken or otherwise) _requ
A couple of points of clarification:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:29:25AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 07:09:57AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > If the answer is that they need to be core devs, then the problem
> > becomes "what is the appropriate path to get to core dev"? One
>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 07:09:57AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> If the answer is that they need to be core devs, then the problem
> becomes "what is the appropriate path to get to core dev"? One
> expectation seems to be to get MOTU first. But MOTU doesn't seem like
> the right path to me. We get ap
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 07:09:57AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> I'm writing to ubuntu-devel with my DMB hat because I'd like to hear the
> opinions of existing Ubuntu developers.
>
> Eric and Dave both work for STS - Sustaining Engineering (L3 support), a
> department within Canonical. They've both
I'm writing to ubuntu-devel with my DMB hat because I'd like to hear the
opinions of existing Ubuntu developers.
Eric and Dave both work for STS - Sustaining Engineering (L3 support), a
department within Canonical. They've both applied to the DMB recently.
Both are motivated primarily by the need
13 matches
Mail list logo
