On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:08:24PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=563eac74595
> + if ! echo '[ ! -d /run/systemd/system ] ||
Note that, further to a thread here a while ago, this test is broken on
Trusty (false positive).
Hello all,
Steve Langasek [2018-02-22 16:36 -0800]:
> > OK, so I suppose we could replace the check with
>
> > if running_systemd
> > wait for network-online.target
> > else
> > wait for runlevel 2
I modified Iain's initial patch and tested/applied:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:49:29PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > - it's supposed to be a SysV backwards compat shim for LSB's "network"
> > > dependency, and not well-defined
> > From my POV, the sane definition is:
> > - DNS setup is complete
> > - all "required" network interfaces
On 22 February 2018 at 20:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:16:01PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
>
>> Or, invoke wait-online directly:
>
>> /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online
>
> That also hard-codes an implementation detail; we may be using
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:16:01PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
> Or, invoke wait-online directly:
> /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online
That also hard-codes an implementation detail; we may be using something
other than systemd-networkd in the runners.
If assuming systemd is unpalatable
Antonio Terceiro [2018-02-21 10:39 -0300]:
> > Cheers! I reworked it a bit, applied the same strategy to LXC (which is
> > equally affected), tested it, and landed
> >
> >
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=20f479254
>
> Aren't _all_ types of testbed
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:48:31PM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> > [ autopkgtest-devel, this is
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-
> February/040138.html
> > and thread FYI - Reply-To /
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:44:42 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
> Steve Langasek [2018-02-16 11:12 -0800]:
...
> > I think the network-online.target is the better thing to key on.
>
> I still don't like that much, though:
> - there is no requirement that this actually gets "implemented" or even
>
Steve Langasek [2018-02-16 11:12 -0800]:
> > > [ -n "$(ip route show to 0/0)" ]
>
> > This is better though, and works too. Please take a look at the attached
> > patch. Thanks! :-)
>
> Actually no, this is racy, because the route comes up before DNS resolution
> is in place.
I'm not actually
Hello all,
Iain Lane [2018-02-16 11:52 +]:
> > I wouldn't pick on any of these: network-online.target is a sloppily defined
> > shim for SysV init backwards compatibility, and may not ever get started (in
> > fact, that's the goal ☺); and the container might not use networkd, so I
> >
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 08:15:35PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I think the network-online.target is the better thing to key on.
>
> I think we should just grep the apt output and retry if it fails with
> connection error messages.
The problem is a general one though. It's not specific
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:12:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:52:05AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:55:47PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > Hello Iain, all,
>
> > > Iain Lane [2018-02-15 18:48 +]:
> > > > There's a patch attached here
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:52:05AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:55:47PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hello Iain, all,
> > Iain Lane [2018-02-15 18:48 +]:
> > > There's a patch attached here which fixes the problem for me. I'm not
> > > sure if there's a better way to
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:00:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's a bit odd to be "start"ing a target in this manner. Is it even
> necessary to start the target, or would it be sufficient to just check
> is-active in a loop?
Yeah, it is - it needs to be pulled in by something to get
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:48:31PM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> [ autopkgtest-devel, this is
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040138.html
> and thread FYI - Reply-To / Mail-Followup-To set to exclude
> ubuntu-devel from this subthread so reviews go to the right
[ autopkgtest-devel, this is
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040138.html
and thread FYI - Reply-To / Mail-Followup-To set to exclude
ubuntu-devel from this subthread so reviews go to the right place ]
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Stéphane Graber
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]:
> > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using:
> > >
> > > $
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]:
> > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using:
> > >
> > > $
Hello Timo,
Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]:
> On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using:
> >
> > $ autopkgtest-build-lxd ubuntu-daily:bionic/amd64
> >
> > Note this uses Ubuntu Foundations
On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using:
>
> $ autopkgtest-build-lxd ubuntu-daily:bionic/amd64
>
> Note this uses Ubuntu Foundations provided container as the base,
> rather than the third-party image that
Hi,
On 14 February 2018 at 12:01, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm not able to build a bionic container:
>
> autopkgtest-build-lxd images:ubuntu/bionic/amd64
> Creating autopkgtest-prepare-1ay
> Starting autopkgtest-prepare-1ay
> Container finished booting.
Hi
I'm not able to build a bionic container:
autopkgtest-build-lxd images:ubuntu/bionic/amd64
Creating autopkgtest-prepare-1ay
Starting autopkgtest-prepare-1ay
Container finished booting. Distribution Ubuntu, release bionic,
architecture amd64
Running setup script
22 matches
Mail list logo