Re: collecting Python 3 status information

2011-02-22 Thread Allison Randal
On 02/20/2011 11:16 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I think you need an upstream status field, for instance for python-testtools which is single-source python 3.2+ compatible, but may not be packaged thusly. Ah, thanks, yes the field needs a clearer name. I've changed "Notes" to "Upstream Python 3 P

Re: collecting Python 3 status information

2011-02-20 Thread Robert Collins
I think you need an upstream status field, for instance for python-testtools which is single-source python 3.2+ compatible, but may not be packaged thusly. -Rob -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf

collecting Python 3 status information

2011-02-20 Thread Allison Randal
Matthias, Barry, and I are working on collecting information about Python packages and when/whether they're planning to migrate to Python 3. Some of that information can only be collected manually, so we're hoping to get some help. I've generated a wiki page of source packages in main that depe