Re: libgit2 switch from mbedTLS to OpenSSL

2022-07-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 04:48:43AM -0700, Simon Chopin wrote: > Quoting Heinrich Schuchardt (2022-06-29 12:56:57) > > On 6/29/22 10:33, Simon Chopin wrote: > > > As part of our efforts to support the Rust toolchain in main, we need to > > > have libgit2 in main (depend

Re: libgit2 switch from mbedTLS to OpenSSL

2022-06-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 20:33, Simon Chopin wrote: > Hi! > > As part of our efforts to support the Rust toolchain in main, we need to > have libgit2 in main (dependency of cargo). However, it currently links > against mbedTLS for its HTTPS backend rather than OpenSSL, for licensing

Re: libgit2 switch from mbedTLS to OpenSSL

2022-06-30 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Heinrich Schuchardt (2022-06-29 12:56:57) > On 6/29/22 10:33, Simon Chopin wrote: > > Hi! > > > > As part of our efforts to support the Rust toolchain in main, we need to > > have libgit2 in main (dependency of cargo). However, it currently links > > agai

Re: libgit2 switch from mbedTLS to OpenSSL

2022-06-29 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 6/29/22 10:33, Simon Chopin wrote: Hi! As part of our efforts to support the Rust toolchain in main, we need to have libgit2 in main (dependency of cargo). However, it currently links against mbedTLS for its HTTPS backend rather than OpenSSL, for licensing reasons IIUC. Those reasons would

libgit2 switch from mbedTLS to OpenSSL

2022-06-29 Thread Simon Chopin
Hi! As part of our efforts to support the Rust toolchain in main, we need to have libgit2 in main (dependency of cargo). However, it currently links against mbedTLS for its HTTPS backend rather than OpenSSL, for licensing reasons IIUC. Those reasons would now be invalid with the new OpenSSL 3.0

Re: libgit2

2015-02-20 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi, On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:00:17 +, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I'd say that makes it the responsibility of whatever team cares about > libgit2-glib and gitg to sort. I'm happy to remove from the archive > if that means we can get the newer version of libgit in. As far

Re: libgit2

2015-02-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:14:02PM +0100, Harald Sitter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Jackson Doak wrote: > > Just looking through upstream logs, this should be as simple as uploading > > libgit2-glib 0.22.0 and gitg 3.15.1 > > unfortunately there's symbol

Re: libgit2

2015-02-17 Thread Harald Sitter
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Jackson Doak wrote: > Just looking through upstream logs, this should be as simple as uploading > libgit2-glib 0.22.0 and gitg 3.15.1 unfortunately there's symbol retractions without soname change :( http://paste.ubuntu.com/10271618/ -- ubuntu-de

Re: libgit2

2015-02-16 Thread Jackson Doak
Just looking through upstream logs, this should be as simple as uploading libgit2-glib 0.22.0 and gitg 3.15.1 On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Harald Sitter wrote: > it would be very lovely if someone who's interested in gitg could have > a look at transitioning libgit2 - libgit2-gli

libgit2

2015-02-16 Thread Harald Sitter
it would be very lovely if someone who's interested in gitg could have a look at transitioning libgit2 - libgit2-glib - gitg to libgit2 0.22. 0.21 apparently had stability problems in the editor kate so 0.22 is a minimum requirement there. cheers HS -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-