Re: lsb printing support [Was, Re: Qt3 and LSB compliance]

2011-03-02 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 03/02/2011 09:35 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:31:15PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: Nothing in main depends on the lsb package except for kubuntu-full, and nothing installs it by default. Are you saying that you intended to *add* a new dependency on lsb in natty? (If

Re: lsb printing support [Was, Re: Qt3 and LSB compliance]

2011-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:31:15PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > >Nothing in main depends on the lsb package except for kubuntu-full, and > >nothing installs it by default. Are you saying that you intended to *add* a > >new dependency on lsb in natty? (If so, that would appear to require a > >f

Re: lsb printing support [Was, Re: Qt3 and LSB compliance]

2011-03-02 Thread Till Kamppeter
On 03/02/2011 07:46 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:04:45PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: On 03/02/2011 05:53 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: I take it we'd still need to keep Qt3 around in universe for some time. Would it be feasible to move lsb-desktop and lsb to universe as well?

Re: lsb printing support [Was, Re: Qt3 and LSB compliance]

2011-03-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, March 02, 2011 01:46:15 pm Steve Langasek wrote: > Nothing in main depends on the lsb package except for kubuntu-full... I just removed it from the seed so after the next kubuntu-meta upload it will be gone. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modif

lsb printing support [Was, Re: Qt3 and LSB compliance]

2011-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:04:45PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > On 03/02/2011 05:53 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > >I take it we'd still need to keep Qt3 around in universe for some > >time. Would it be feasible to move lsb-desktop and lsb to universe as > >well? The only real main dependency of it tha