On Friday, November 09, 2012 09:34:37 PM Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 8 November 2012 15:10, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> > On 7 November 2012 12:55, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> >> As part of the ongoing goal to remove python2 from the installation
> >> media [1] ndisgtk was identified to still be u
On 8 November 2012 15:10, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 12:55, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> As part of the ongoing goal to remove python2 from the installation
>> media [1] ndisgtk was identified to still be using python2, pygtk and
>> python-glade2.
>>
>> Are there plans to port ndi
Dmitrijs Ledkovs [2012-11-07 12:55 +]:
> Are there plans to port ndisgtk to python3, pygi and gtkbuilder ?
> Is ndisgtk still needed? Or can ubuntu-drivers-common take over this
> functionality.
Conceptually u-d-common is a level above ndiswrapper as far as the
actual drivers are concerned. It
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:10:02PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 12:55, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> > As part of the ongoing goal to remove python2 from the installation
> > media [1] ndisgtk was identified to still be using python2, pygtk and
> > python-glade2.
> >
> > Are the
On 7 November 2012 12:55, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> As part of the ongoing goal to remove python2 from the installation
> media [1] ndisgtk was identified to still be using python2, pygtk and
> python-glade2.
>
> Are there plans to port ndisgtk to python3, pygi and gtkbuilder ?
> Is ndisgtk still
As part of the ongoing goal to remove python2 from the installation
media [1] ndisgtk was identified to still be using python2, pygtk and
python-glade2.
Are there plans to port ndisgtk to python3, pygi and gtkbuilder ?
Is ndisgtk still needed? Or can ubuntu-drivers-common take over this
functional
