On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/6/16 TImo Aaltonen :
Well, the Father's Day for us Scandinavians is the second Sunday of
November, so traveling the weekend from US would basically mean missing it
:)
Father's day in Denmark is actually June 5th.
(We also don't consider Finland p
2011/6/16 TImo Aaltonen :
> Well, the Father's Day for us Scandinavians is the second Sunday of
> November, so traveling the weekend from US would basically mean missing it
> :)
Father's day in Denmark is actually June 5th.
(We also don't consider Finland part of Scandinavia. Perhaps these
facts
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:28:59 AM TImo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 16.06.2011 09:17, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:41:49PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:48 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> >>> A few practical considerations I ran through:
> >>>
> >>> -
On 16.06.2011 09:17, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:41:49PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:48 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
A few practical considerations I ran through:
- Release on Oct 11 means UDS on Oct 29-Nov 2 (the week of Halloween)
- Release on Oct
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:17 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:41:49PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:48 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> > > A few practical considerations I ran through:
> > >
> > > - Release on Oct 11 means UDS on Oct 29-Nov 2 (the we
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:41:49PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:48 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> > A few practical considerations I ran through:
> >
> > - Release on Oct 11 means UDS on Oct 29-Nov 2 (the week of Halloween)
> > - Release on Oct 18 means UDS on Nov 5-9
> > - R
Allison Randal [2011-06-13 23:57 -0700]:
> Q: October 18, 2012 (25 weeks)
> R: April 18, 2013 (26 weeks)
>
> And after that follow a more-or-less 26/26 split (barring interference
> by international holidays, etc). Would this change be helpful or harmful
> for you?
That sounds better indeed. Peop
Steve Beattie [2011-06-15 15:58 -0700]:
> Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams, shouldn't we
> be emphasizing the Feature Freeze date rather than the actual Release
> date? That's the merge window deadline they should be targeting, and
> where the Ubuntu cadence should be most re
On 06/15/2011 07:41 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
>
> Does UDS have to be a fixed number of days from the release?
It's been as short as 1 week after the release (no break, not much time
to prepare), and as long as 6 weeks after (cuts heavily into the work of
the cycle). So no hard rules, just weighing th
Ted Gould On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:48 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
>> A few practical considerations I ran through:
>>
>> - Release on Oct 11 means UDS on Oct 29-Nov 2 (the week of Halloween)
>> - Release on Oct 18 means UDS on Nov 5-9
>> - Release on Oct 25 means UDS on Nov 12-17 (the week befo
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 14:48 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> A few practical considerations I ran through:
>
> - Release on Oct 11 means UDS on Oct 29-Nov 2 (the week of Halloween)
> - Release on Oct 18 means UDS on Nov 5-9
> - Release on Oct 25 means UDS on Nov 12-17 (the week before Thanksgiving)
Micah Gersten wrote:
>On 06/15/2011 05:58 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:58PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
>>> Very valuable perspective, thanks. To other upstreams, do you have
>>> similar or opposite needs?
>> Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams,
Steve Beattie wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:58PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
>> Very valuable perspective, thanks. To other upstreams, do you have
>> similar or opposite needs?
>
>Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams, shouldn't we
>be emphasizing the Feature Freeze d
On 06/15/2011 05:58 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:58PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
>> Very valuable perspective, thanks. To other upstreams, do you have
>> similar or opposite needs?
> Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams, shouldn't we
> be emphasizing
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:58:54PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:58PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> > Very valuable perspective, thanks. To other upstreams, do you have
> > similar or opposite needs?
>
> Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams, should
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:48:58PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Very valuable perspective, thanks. To other upstreams, do you have
> similar or opposite needs?
Perhaps this is just me being naive, but with upstreams, shouldn't we
be emphasizing the Feature Freeze date rather than the actual Rele
On 06/15/2011 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> For Kubuntu, when we've been able to release at the end of the month we've
> been able to release with KDE 4.X.2. For Maverick we had to release with
> 4.5.1. This required significant effort on the part of Kubuntu developers to
> review all the
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 01:57:11 AM Allison Randal wrote:
> At UDS-O, we talked about balancing the 6-month cycle from the current
> 24/28 split towards a more even split. The general consensus was to keep
> the long 28 week cycle for P, since it's an LTS, but discuss more for Q
> and R.
>
> For
At UDS-O, we talked about balancing the 6-month cycle from the current
24/28 split towards a more even split. The general consensus was to keep
the long 28 week cycle for P, since it's an LTS, but discuss more for Q
and R.
For context, I did a little walk down memory lane:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
