Op vrijdag 02-11-2007 om 10:14 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Sebastian
Heinlein:
> Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 16:55 +0100 schrieb Jan Claeys:
> >
> > Such a solution would probably solve many issues. It should also be
> > able to hide all "system" settings for users that have no rights to
> > c
Isn't GPL v3 APL compatible? Are we talking GPL v2, GPL v3, or GPL v2 and
later?
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
raeez wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was recommended by a few people to bring the following bug to the
> attention of this list:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/148976
>
> I have ideas on how we could go about implementing this, but I would
> also love to receive feedback on whether what I've pr
Hello. I blogged this one so you can pick up the gist of it below.
Otherwise skip the link, read the e-mail.
http://blackfiber.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/cant-redistribute-mod_security-binaries/
The long and short of this is that mod_security has a license conflict
with Apache in that the source
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 16:55 +0100 schrieb Jan Claeys:
>
> Such a solution would probably solve many issues. It should also be
> able to hide all "system" settings for users that have no rights to
> change them.
This is already the case.
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital si
