Am 09.11.2007 um 02:15 schrieb Evan:
When a binary is [attempted to] run, instead of giving the current
error, provide a dialogue that notifies the user of the fact that
it is a Windows program that cannot be run normally under Ubuntu.
While additional funtionality might be desireable,
Am 09.11.2007 um 02:28 schrieb Greg K Nicholson:
Is a compatibility layer (like Wine) to run Mac OS X programs on Linux
feasible? Does one already exist?
I'm aware of about 5 emulators (PearPC, mac-on-linux, Basilisk,
SheepShaver, qemu) having various extents of Mac OS and Mac OS X
On Friday 09 November 2007 04:09, Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
Reinhard Tartler spake thusly:
Scott (angrykeyboarder) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose
OK...
Off to plan B.
getdeb.net
Oh wait, Ubuntu developers get
Scott (angrykeyboarder) wrote:
Gutsy shipped with a *non-final* release of The GIMP (2.4 RC3, to be
specific).
Apart from the question whether an update should land in updates or
backports, I think there definitely is a valid point here: Users have
been taught that beta software (or release
On Nov 9, 2007 9:00 PM, Kai Schroeder writes:
Apart from the question whether an update should land in updates or
backports, I think there definitely is a valid point here: Users have
been taught that beta software (or release candidates) should not be
used on production machines. Now, every
Kai Schroeder:
Now, every time they start the gimp, a
splash screen appears which says release candidate
(Actually, it says “release conadidate”, for me anyway :) )
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
OK, thanks. Just wondering out loud. :)
--
Greg
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Greg K Nicholson wrote:
Kai Schroeder:
Now, every time they start the gimp, a
splash screen appears which says release candidate
(Actually, it says “release conadidate”, for me anyway :) )
at least we have a bug now!
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 13:47 +, randall wrote:
Greg K Nicholson wrote:
Kai Schroeder:
Now, every time they start the gimp, a
splash screen appears which says release candidate
(Actually, it says “release conadidate”, for me anyway :) )
at least we have a bug now!
Hi,
Daniel T. Chen ha scritto:
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 19:26 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As a rule, developers aren't terribly impressed by version numbers. What
problem are you
having that you think this would fix and that is severe enough to warrant a
stable release
update?
Really
Wouldn't logic dictate that if their latest release was for bugfixes,
that they would recommend an update? Or do developers update software
just for the heck of it?
I haven't done an official study or anything, but I'd be willing to bet that a
month after Gutsy is out, about half the packages
Aaron C. de Bruyn:
Upgrading simply because there is a newer version number is the wrong
attitude.
It's not that fact that it's a newer version (number): it's that it's a
final, stable release versus a non-final non-stable release.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Le jeudi 08 novembre 2007 à 21:22 -0700, Scott (angrykeyboarder) a
écrit :
Cool. Leave us with a *major* app (ordinarily in the main repository)
for months without official support. Sounds like a good plan to me.
The package is support as any main package in Ubuntu, your statement is
just not
Scott Kitterman spake thusly:
You provide packages that are newer/not in the official repositories. With
the exception of packages that are legally questionable for the official
repositories, why?
Why? Because people want newer packages.
And trying to get them through official
Scott (angrykeyboarder) spake thusly:
Sebastian Heinlein spake thusly:
Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2007, 20:58 -0700 schrieb Scott
(angrykeyboarder):
None that would interest [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose
You should get used to talk about facts.
As I implied previously my internet
On Nov 4, 2007 6:35 PM, Oystein Viggen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [Nicolas Deschildre]
My point was not about the parameter itself. My point was about the
ability to edit the kernel parameters while booting.
IIRC lilo won't allow you that.
16 matches
Mail list logo
