On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:41:40PM +, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote:
> That might confuse an user who is trying to install (Ed/K/xpto)ubuntu to
> disk, wouldnt it?
> Also, with all the bugs with framebuffer, many users wont even be able to see
> anything until they reach the Desktop.
Just for
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:17:15AM +0900, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> What process do I need to follow to get this approved?
>
> (I have the source package and
> http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-update.en.html
> I can create a linux-ubuntu-modules source package that includes
> compcache
Milan pisze:
Almost a year ago, I reported an issue [1] that appeared in OO.o Witer
in Feisty: the default font is set to "Times", which does not exist and
actually acts as an alias for the former default "Nimbus Roman No 9 L"
(this does not affect users that upgraded from Edgy and older).
The p
Having "Nimbus Roman No 9 L" as the default results in the font included in the
document, when exporting to .ps or .pdf, making the result much bigger than it
should. There should be a bug report for this as well. We maybe can avoid the
inclusion of the font in the generated .ps or .pdf, but how
Almost a year ago, I reported an issue [1] that appeared in OO.o Witer
in Feisty: the default font is set to "Times", which does not exist and
actually acts as an alias for the former default "Nimbus Roman No 9 L"
(this does not affect users that upgraded from Edgy and older).
The problem is, peop
On Monday 03 March 2008 17:09:19 Evan Dandrea wrote:
> Perhaps we could write to usplash? There's plenty of empty space for a
> verbose message and (imho) it's more noticeable than a desktop notification.
That might confuse an user who is trying to install (Ed/K/xpto)ubuntu to disk,
wouldnt it?
Just use rsync:
rsync -zhP
rsync://cdimage.ubuntu.com/cdimage/daily-live/current/hardy-desktop-i386.iso .
--
BUGabundo :o)
(``-_-´´) http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:08:00PM +0900, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> > I am trying to package compcache.
>
> A much better solution is to get it included in linux-ubuntu-modules.
What process do I need to follow to g
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:08:00PM +0900, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> I am trying to package compcache.
A much better solution is to get it included in linux-ubuntu-modules.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modi
I am trying to package compcache. Control.modules.in does not seem to
be used by debuild. Other packages of compiled modules in Ubuntu don't
seem to use control.modules.in. Am I correct in assuming that
control.modules.in is only used when users compile their own modules
using the module assistant?
10 matches
Mail list logo
