Matt Wheeler wrote:
> but can we trust update-manager not to break and give someone
> privileges they shouldn't have? I don't know, maybe we can, I just
> think it's worth being very careful about it.
If you don't trust update-manager you would have to check everything
after an update. I don't t
2009/4/4 Remco :
> That's a different idea though. My idea is that having to provide a
> password is an unnecessary hurdle to people. Why must a password be
> provided to start the update process? A policy could be made to allow
> the update manager to do its thing without passwords.
Unless I'm mi
2009/4/3 (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo :
> Olá Remco e a todos.
>
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 14:12:00 Remco wrote:
>> One wishlist idea I have is that updates can be installed without having to
>> provide a password.
>
> There's a public wishbug to allow Security Updates to be auto-installed, as
> an o
Hello Experts,
I am doing some syslog analysis from various devices.
For Linux, i was trying to find if there is a document listing formats for
ALL logs that linux sends out...
-e.g. ---
<92>pure-ftpd: (?...@theman) [WARNING] Authentication failed for user [root]
<38>sshd(pam_unix)[22547]:
Olá Remco e a todos.
On Thursday 02 April 2009 14:12:00 Remco wrote:
> One wishlist idea I have is that updates can be installed without having to
> provide a password.
There's a public wishbug to allow Security Updates to be auto-installed, as an
option available on OEM,regular installer an on
Olá Matthew e a todos.
On Thursday 02 April 2009 09:47:32 Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> For example here, if measurement has shown that downloading on average
> takes 60% of the time and installing on average takes 40 % of the time,
> and you're installing updates where the downloading is 80 % comp
