Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2009 12:40:04 am Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Somewhat relevant, yes, but I think people talking in that page don't
>> understand correctly the root cause of the problem. Linux scheduler is
>> good enough nowadays that even lots of processes all eating 100%
On Friday 08 May 2009 12:40:04 am Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Somewhat relevant, yes, but I think people talking in that page don't
> understand correctly the root cause of the problem. Linux scheduler is
> good enough nowadays that even lots of processes all eating 100% CPU
> don't make the syste
On May 7, 2009, at 10:35 PM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> If some process has been eating 100% CPU for hours, there should be
> some
> kind of a notification that it's happening. Like a small icon could
> appear to gnome panel and clicking
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> If some process has been eating 100% CPU for hours, there should be some
> kind of a notification that it's happening. Like a small icon could
> appear to gnome panel and clicking it would show the process details and
> allow to kill it.
Th
If some process has been eating 100% CPU for hours, there should be some
kind of a notification that it's happening. Like a small icon could
appear to gnome panel and clicking it would show the process details and
allow to kill it.
Nowadays with multicore processors this 100% CPU usage can be diff
gnome chooser is a great tool among others, but i do not like the idea to
add it by default but merge it with appearance preferences tool in gnome, it
is very poor and gnome color chooser is powerful, so it could work like
another tab inside it
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-dis
> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 12:42:06 -0500
> From: Patrick Goetz
> Subject: The creeping religion of click on this
> To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <4a01cbee.1050...@mail.utexas.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> it occurred to me that I ha
So, I got my hands on a nice little netbook recently. I originally put
Fedora on there (which does astoundingly well with boot splashes, sound
and bluetooth - the upcoming Bluetooth stuff is seamless and great on
the interface front, whereas Ubuntu's current doesn't seem to receive
file transfers b
Op maandag 04-05-2009 om 19:52 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Evan:
> Is there an option to display notifications even when the Rhythmbox
> window is open?
No idea, but...
> If not, I imagine it would be a trivial hack, and would like to take a
> stab at it myself (either via recompiling or writin
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 06:49 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> (I'm not subscribed, please CC)
>
> Quoting Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic (m...@ubuntu.com):
>
>
> (for shadow)
>
>
> > shadow (1:4.1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* The "Le Puant Mac??r??" release.
> > Sorry for the lack
(I'm not subscribed, please CC)
Quoting Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic (m...@ubuntu.com):
(for shadow)
> shadow (1:4.1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* The "Le Puant Mac??r??" release.
> Sorry for the lack of cheese name in 1:4.1.3-1. At least this one should
> count for two.
It see
11 matches
Mail list logo
