On Monday 25 May 2009 12:05:57 am Christopher Chan wrote:
The 64-bit version of sarg segfaults. There is a one line patch from
2007 that finally got rolled into a sarg-2.2.5-2 diff for the debian
sarg package that fixes the problem I encountered. Could someone please
update the sarg package
I've attached a patch here [1] which fixes this too.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236769
--
Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com
Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Am 25.05.2009 um 03:46 schrieb Christopher James Halse Rogers:
Supporting package downgrades means
supporting package downgrades in general, and this would require that
package maintainers write back-conversion utilities where necessary.
... or to make a copy of the original settings just
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:12 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
That is not the case with OpenSolaris based ZFS root capable
installations. While the whole disk maybe taken up by a zfs pool, the
installation will create three at least zfs filesystems. ROOT/,
ROOT/opt, export, and export/home
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:58 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/05/2009 alle 02.09 +0200, Markus Hitter ha scritto:
Craft a system where people can switch back and forth between
different package versions. This update broke foo? - Report a bug
and switch foo back to the
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Christopher James Halse Rogers
r...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:12 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
That is not the case with OpenSolaris based ZFS root capable
installations. While the whole disk maybe taken up by a zfs pool, the
installation will
Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:12 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
That is not the case with OpenSolaris based ZFS root capable
installations. While the whole disk maybe taken up by a zfs pool, the
installation will create three at least zfs filesystems.
Alternatively, replace Evolution with MySQL or such.
This is what I understand to be the hard problem in *supporting* package
downgrades.
Ah, but this is no longer 'roll back' relevant. No fancy zapped file
system will help there.
/me thinking of fresh new install
Jan Claeys wrote:
A lot of people run unstable during alpha beta, but many do it in a VM
or on an old spare system. That doesn't help find regressions that are
hardware-related, of course, and in general those systems might not see
the same sort of use that people's main computers see.
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:24 +0200, Remco wrote:
...
Downgrade
conversion is probably not feasible for any but the most popular
packages.
I completely agree with your message. Of course, expecting every package
to provide a downgrade converter is unrealistic. On the other hand, how
often do
Hi,
This would be of interest to Ubuntu developers.
Regards
Anil
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anil Gulecha anil.ve...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:26 PM
Subject: Nexenta Core Platform 2 Released
To: Open Solaris opensolaris-disc...@opensolaris.org, OpenSolaris
On 25/05/09 21:01, Andrew Sayers wrote:
Jan Claeys wrote:
A lot of people run unstable during alpha beta, but many do it in a VM
or on an old spare system. That doesn't help find regressions that are
hardware-related, of course, and in general those systems might not see
the same sort
12 matches
Mail list logo
