Danny Piccirillo wrote:
> Sorry i dropped off the face of the planet for a while. I am back now! I
> have heard all of the concerns, and i hope i can address them now. I am
> open to change the team, and i want to sincerely apologize for all the
> confusion and misunderstanding. One of the first ch
> I got halfway through a project that would solve broadly the same
> problems as your /etc/issue proposal. It faltered when Launchpad kept
> attaching the blueprint to Drupal and the merge proposal didn't go anywhere.
>
> The would-be blueprint is still available[1], the bug in Launchpad has
> bee
I got halfway through a project that would solve broadly the same
problems as your /etc/issue proposal. It faltered when Launchpad kept
attaching the blueprint to Drupal and the merge proposal didn't go anywhere.
The would-be blueprint is still available[1], the bug in Launchpad has
been fixed[
Greetings All!
I'd like to make some suggestions on the files /etc/issue(.net),
/etc/motd(.tail), and /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh. These files are all in
the base-files package which is maintained by the Ubuntu Core
Developers. It seemed a little presumptuous to post it to
ubuntu-de...@lists
Hey everyone,
Sorry i dropped off the face of the planet for a while. I am back now! I
have heard all of the concerns, and i hope i can address them now. I am open
to change the team, and i want to sincerely apologize for all the confusion
and misunderstanding. One of the first changes i made to t
Hello Mehdi,
Mehdi Dogguy writes:
[ About my scripts to compare version number of OCaml packages in
Unstable and Karmic. ]
> Laby seems missing in your list:
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/laby
I have updated my scripts. Now source packages like laby without binary
dependency
