Thanks Scott, thus there is no update procedure in place for pyqt, which
is changing quite rapidly? I got the impression that a lot of people are
using it actively. But them I do not know on what I am intrinsically
asking for in terms of effort.
Thanks,
Heinz Preisig
--
Heinz A Preisig
David MENTRE wrote:
Hello Scott,
2009/7/21 Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com:
How long do you expect?
A similar transition took 4 weeks in Debian.
Actually, It took 3 weeks :) (considering the rpm transition which
blocked ocaml transition). Hopefully, rpm is now built/installed
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:42:40 +0200 Heinz A Preisig
heinz.prei...@chemeng.ntnu.no wrote:
Thanks Scott, thus there is no update procedure in place for pyqt, which
is changing quite rapidly? I got the impression that a lot of people are
using it actively. But them I do not know on what I am
Dear all,
sorry for crossposting, please notice it before replying to all.
I tend to report all usability bugs I find, in the hope that ubuntu will
become better. The hudred-papercut effort shows that I am not wrong in
reporting those as bugs.
However, it is very easy that a developer does
Il 22/07/2009 18:47, Vincenzo Ciancia ha scritto:
Dear all,
sorry for crossposting, please notice it before replying to all.
I am possibly a bit of an idiot for what I did, but luckily the other
list which has nothing to do with my target has a moderator.
I generate too much noise. My
Agreed. Ubuntu developers either don't understand my usability
reports or tag them as low priority bugs, which gets triaged for many
releases. Once I have submitted a bug report on an usability issue
that caused information loss, which is serious. In certain PDF
files, I can't search for accented
Il 22/07/2009 19:04, Henrique Almeida ha scritto:
Agreed. Ubuntu developers either don't understand my usability
reports or tag them as low priority bugs, which gets triaged for many
releases.
This is because these are not crashers and typically just affect a small
portion of the
On mer., 2009-07-22 at 18:47 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
However, it is very easy that a developer does not recognise an
usability-related bug report, and confuses it with a more or less
strange support request, and I often have to discuss to have it
accepted
as a bug.
The issue is
However, it is very easy that a developer does not recognise an
usability-related bug report, and confuses it with a more or less
strange support request, and I often have to discuss to have it
accepted as a bug.
The issue is that Ubuntu doesn't write most of the softwares it
distribute
Il 22/07/2009 22:53, Mikus Grinbergs ha scritto:
Let me suggest that Ubuntu appoint an usability triager/ombudsman,
to determine (from the Ubuntu users' perspective, not from an Ubuntu
developers' perspective) how much attention ought to be paid to each
and every usability-related bug report.
+1, me too, etc...
See the comments in bug 294523 at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/294523
A few users have tried to report/push/discuss for this for a few releases
already but it seems the bug is low priority even though its a usability
pain and that too right at the start of
One Hundred Paper Cut Method,
After getting tired of reading this list where almost every user request
has been handled with the standard RTFM reply and dismissed as a newbie
error, I decided to look around at various other Linux distributions. I
even went upstream to find out if anyone had a
12 matches
Mail list logo