I as many users want to try different compiz effects (e.g. 3D
desktop). Why wouldn't include configuration utility for this in
Ubuntu distribution? I prefer to use compizconfig-settings-manager,
but it may be something else.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.c
Hi Luke, and list...
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 03:04 -0500, Luke L wrote:
> I suggested at least a year ago that modifications be made to the
> development and maintenance schedule for releases, such as 6 month
> lifetimes for non-LTS releases, and using LTS-1 releases as the base
> for LTS instead of
I installed to sda12 from the kubuntu alternate karmicRC CD, installed mc,
then did apt-get update;apt-get upgrade. The upgrade installed roughly 160
packages. Most of the time spent doing that upgrade, an absurd length, was
displaying messages about finding other distributions on other partitions.
In this resolution icons of main menus items have sizes bigger than I
want. This sizes hard coded in Human theme as gtk-icon-sizes =
"panel-menu=24,24:gtk-button=16,16". To change this behavior I must
edit Human theme. Is this Ubuntu way?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@
Compatible features are has_journal, dir_index, filetype, sparse_super and
large_file. Use tune2fs or debugfs to remove features.
I don't see in the mkfs.ext3 man page why any existing features should be
incompatible. Where's the list of what's compatible? Why doesn't the
installer say which featu
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 07:14 +, Alex Cockell wrote:
> For example - is new hardware support regularly SRU'd back into the
> current LTS release, after decent QA?
Yes for kernel modules:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/linux-backports-modules-hardy
I'm not sure how X.org drivers are handled
As it is kinda issue I have always raised, I think biggest problem is
inconsistent hardware support. Not poor, but inconsistent. Hardware
section is where most regressions shows their ugly heads. But this
require bigger, more coordinated effort between distros and kernel
developers.
It is also bad
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Alex Cockell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> First of all - I am your putative end-user. I bought my Thinkpad R61i
> from Linux Emporium with standard 8.04 Desktop preinstalled (off
> Canonical's repos - not a downstream version like Mint or Dell's own),
> and only use sof
Hi folks,
First of all - I am your putative end-user. I bought my Thinkpad R61i
from Linux Emporium with standard 8.04 Desktop preinstalled (off
Canonical's repos - not a downstream version like Mint or Dell's own),
and only use software out of Canonical's official repos. I'm also going
to be V
