Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Kjell Le
And then we have the debian way... :) On 2 May 2010 06:38, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:15 -0700, George Farris wrote: > >> Well then IMHO it should probably have been left at the old behavior >> until it was ready.  Why totally mess people up with something they have >>

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:15 -0700, George Farris wrote: > Well then IMHO it should probably have been left at the old behavior > until it was ready. Why totally mess people up with something they have > been doing for "years"? It seems an odd and very broken decision > process. Just sayin! > T

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Christopher Lees
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 12:00 +0100, George Farris wrote: > > Wait just a bit. The problem is that the notification area is a poor > > replacement of the window list. Instead of big strips with an icon and > > a title, it's just a tiny icon. And that icon even has arbitrary > > behavior. The idea is

Re: Why and why.

2010-05-01 Thread Luke L
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:15 PM, George Farris wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 20:58 +0200, Remco wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 20:45, Chandru wrote: >> > It is proposed that from 11.04 the notification area (which allows actions >> > like opening the window with single click and pausing with