Re: Dump Google?

2010-09-10 Thread Greg
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Harry Strongburg wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:58:29PM -0700, Jordan wrote: > > Why not drop Google and go for a more private search engine? > > Yes, let's suggest for Ubuntu users use an obscure search engine, > because they are worried someone at Google Inc

Re: Dump Google?

2010-09-10 Thread Harry Strongburg
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:58:29PM -0700, Jordan wrote: > Why not drop Google and go for a more private search engine? Yes, let's suggest for Ubuntu users use an obscure search engine, because they are worried someone at Google Inc may be knowing what kind of searches they do. Anyone who is conc

Re: Dump Google?

2010-09-10 Thread Danny Piccirillo
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 23:14, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Jordan wrote: >> Dear Ubuntu Developers, >> >> I'm not sure if I'm the first person to suggest this, but lately >> Google's reputation has diminished, especially with talk of them being >> Big Brother (yes,

Re: Dump Google?

2010-09-10 Thread Martin Albisetti
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Jordan wrote: > Dear Ubuntu Developers, > > I'm not sure if I'm the first person to suggest this, but lately > Google's reputation has diminished, especially with talk of them being > Big Brother (yes, I know what server my email's on).  Why not drop > Google and

Dump Google?

2010-09-10 Thread Jordan
Dear Ubuntu Developers, I'm not sure if I'm the first person to suggest this, but lately Google's reputation has diminished, especially with talk of them being Big Brother (yes, I know what server my email's on). Why not drop Google and go for a more private search engine? I know of a few und

Overriding binaries in Debian Source 3 (quilt)

2010-09-10 Thread Dave Walker
Hi, In Debian Source 3 (quilt), it seems the method of including binaries no longer require uuencoding they simply need to be put in-place and the path put in the file debian/source/include-binaries. This is *great*. Here is where the problem lies, if *overiding* a binary; rather than adding a n