On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Harry Strongburg harry.ubu...@harry.luwrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:58:29PM -0700, Jordan wrote:
Why not drop Google and go for a more private search engine?
Yes, let's suggest for Ubuntu users use an obscure search engine,
because they are worried
Well, I'm not much of an Ubuntu user.
But I've been hanging around on the internet since there wasn't no Google
at all. Today, the average user expects to find a Google search
pane in their Firefox, Chromium, Konqueror -- so why dump it?
Is there a sensible alternative?
flori
--
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 05:50:05AM +, Harry Strongburg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:58:29PM -0700, Jordan wrote:
Why not drop Google and go for a more private search engine?
Yes, let's suggest for Ubuntu users use an obscure search engine,
because they are worried someone at
On 09/11/2010 07:49 AM, Florian Rehnisch wrote:
Well, I'm not much of an Ubuntu user.
But I've been hanging around on the internet since there wasn't no Google
at all. Today, the average user expects to find a Google search
pane in their Firefox, Chromium, Konqueror -- so why dump it?
Is
What other engine do you use, if you do not mind me asking?
Simon Ponder
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 05:50:05AM +, Harry Strongburg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:58:29PM -0700, Jordan wrote:
Why not drop Google and go for a more private search engine?
Yes, let's suggest for Ubuntu users
On 09/11/2010 12:06 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
Google's archiving all searches isn't the only reason to dump it. If you
are willing to use a search engine that censors web sites at China's
whim go right ahead. Google puts their profit ahead of their stated
support of the free flow of
On 09/10/2010 08:14 PM, Martin Albisetti wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Jordanjordanh...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Ubuntu Developers,
I'm not sure if I'm the first person to suggest this, but lately
Google's reputation has diminished, especially with talk of them being
Big
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:57:05AM +0100, Dave Walker wrote:
I assumed that leaving it a day or so, would mean that the buildd
environment updating to that dpkg version would mean that this issue is
resolved for Maverick.
However, this seems not to be the case. When uploading to Maverick
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 03:21:51PM -0400, Simon Ponder wrote:
What other engine do you use, if you do not mind me asking?
..snip..
Icerocket, although it's been getting flaky on me as of late.
--
Bob Holtzman
Key ID: 8D549279
If you think you're getting free lunch,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:22:44PM +0530, Owais Lone wrote:
I wonder what will the new installer install if I check the
install proprietary software.. Media codecs? Drivers?
A lot of my friends have the broadcom wifi in their laptops, the driver is
shipped with the Ubuntu CD.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:23:51PM -0700, Brian Vaughan wrote:
On 09/11/2010 12:06 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
Google's archiving all searches isn't the only reason to dump it. If you
are willing to use a search engine that censors web sites at China's
whim go right ahead. Google puts their
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:17:06PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:06 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
hol...@cox.net wrote:
..snip..
Google's archiving all searches isn't the only reason to dump it. If you
are willing to use a
On Sunday 12 September 2010 12:49 AM, Jordan wrote:
Google does store user's information, such as I.P. addresses and the
searches (yes, the I.P. address goes away after 8 months) and they
transmit a crazy amount information back to the server (autocomplete for
instance).
Well IP address
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Jordan jordanh...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, only a suggestion...I'm trying to make Ubuntu better as much as
the next guy. Sorry if I made anyone angry.
Sorry my reply was so dry. I shouldn't reply to email on Friday evenings :)
I appreciate spirit of your idea,
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 3:51 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
hol...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:17:06PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:06 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
hol...@cox.net wrote:
..snip..
Google's
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 3:33 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
hol...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 03:21:51PM -0400, Simon Ponder wrote:
What other engine do you use, if you do not mind me asking?
..snip..
Icerocket, although it's been getting flaky
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:06:36PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
If you are willing to use a search engine that censors web sites at
China's whim go right ahead. Google puts their profit ahead of their
stated support of the free flow of information. Only the lazy or those
who are uninformed
--On Friday, September 10, 2010 7:58 PM -0700 Jordan jordanh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Ubuntu Developers,
I'm not sure if I'm the first person to suggest this, but lately
Google's reputation has diminished, especially with talk of them being
Big Brother (yes, I know what server my email's
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 05:34:25PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 3:33 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
hol...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 03:21:51PM -0400, Simon Ponder wrote:
What other engine do you use, if you do not mind me asking?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 05:32:31PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 3:51 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
hol...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:17:06PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:06 PM -0700 Robert Holtzman
20 matches
Mail list logo
