Canonical fleeces the gnome foundation?

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Goetz
I found this article to be extremely disturbing. Surely the negative PR of such a move isn't worth $1/yr in revenue? Who's making these brain-damaged decisions? http://www.networkworld.com/community/banshee-amazon-store-disabled-by-canonical-in-ubuntu -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing

Re: Canonical fleeces the gnome foundation?

2011-02-16 Thread Evan Huus
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Patrick Goetz pgo...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: I found this article to be extremely disturbing.  Surely the negative PR of such a move isn't worth $1/yr in revenue?  Who's making these brain-damaged decisions?

Re: Canonical fleeces the gnome foundation?

2011-02-16 Thread Adrian Petrescu
I'm more curious about the pragmatic aspects here -- in what sense are the Banshee maintainers able to disable the Amazon store by default? If Canonical is the one packaging and shipping it, and Banshee is open source software, can't they just re-enable it on the version in Launchpad that they put

The Dell Latitude reality check

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Goetz
At work we have an automated install system and use a highly customized version of 10.10. For friends and family, I use the standard i386/amd64 Ubuntu Desktop ISO to install Ubuntu on their machines. Recently, I decided to re-install an old Dell Latitude D630 with Maverick so that my

Re: The Dell Latitude reality check

2011-02-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 04:49:40 pm Patrick Goetz wrote: At work we have an automated install system and use a highly customized version of 10.10. For friends and family, I use the standard i386/amd64 Ubuntu Desktop ISO to install Ubuntu on their machines. Recently, I decided to

Re: The Dell Latitude reality check

2011-02-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 15:49 -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote: A better solution would be to include the most common proprietary drivers in some kind of encrypted sandbox on the install CD and let the user choose whether or not he/she would like to use the proprietary drivers at the time of the

Re: The Dell Latitude reality check

2011-02-16 Thread Phillip Susi
When starting a new thread, do not reply to an existing thread and delete all of the text and change the subject. It still shows up as a reply to the original thread. This means people who are ignoring the original thread will never see your message. On 02/16/2011 04:49 PM, Patrick Goetz

Re: The Dell Latitude reality check

2011-02-16 Thread Patrick Goetz
On 2/16/2011 4:07 PM, Paul Smith wrote: The problem is with the licensing of the _proprietary driver_. These drivers typically allow no-charge download directly from the vendor website, but the license includes terms that make REDISTRIBUTION illegal (without permission). If that's the case,

Re: The Dell Latitude reality check

2011-02-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, February 16, 2011 08:45:01 pm Patrick Goetz wrote: On 2/16/2011 4:07 PM, Paul Smith wrote: The problem is with the licensing of the _proprietary driver_. These drivers typically allow no-charge download directly from the vendor website, but the license includes terms that