On 2011-04-24 23:54, Rafael Barreto wrote:
Hello fellows,
Sorry for my bad english.
This is the second time we try to call your attention over this same old issue.
The assaultcube version provided by your repository (1.0.4repack1-1)
is *unplayable*, since our 1.0 masterserver was turned off
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:32 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
On 21 April 2011 16:14, Allison Randal alli...@canonical.com wrote:
- Only ship a very small shim for the client on the CD (advantage of
small footprint), and do the rest of the install the first time someone
uses Ubuntu One.
This is
Rafael Barreto schreef op zo 24-04-2011 om 18:54 [-0300]:
This is the second time we try to call your attention over this same
old issue.
When was the previous time? (Do you have a reference?)
The assaultcube version provided by your repository (1.0.4repack1-1)
is *unplayable*, since our
John Rowland Lenton schreef op do 21-04-2011 om 18:23 [+0100]:
* recently we had to upgrade couchdb in lucid for replication to work,
and the upgrade broke replication with the old version (which was the
reason we needed to upgrade), as well as potentially breaking couch
apps that only
Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote:
John Rowland Lenton schreef op do 21-04-2011 om 18:23 [+0100]:
* recently we had to upgrade couchdb in lucid for replication to
work,
and the upgrade broke replication with the old version (which was
the
reason we needed to upgrade), as well as potentially
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 20:09 +0200, Jan Claeys wrote:
John Rowland Lenton schreef op do 21-04-2011 om 18:23 [+0100]:
* recently we had to upgrade couchdb in lucid for replication to work,
and the upgrade broke replication with the old version (which was the
reason we needed to upgrade),
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:23:52 +0100, John Rowland Lenton
john.len...@canonical.com wrote:
* if our projects switch to, say, python 4, then we'd be looking at
shipping python 4 to all supported ubuntus, including LTS'es.
I can see why you would want to do this for ease of support, but it's
Hey!
Ty for your replies!
I did not sent a mail to Debian Games yet, but after considering a bit,
maybe removing (or moving) the game from the current repository is the
quickest (and dirty) solution to avoid new confuse players.
And yes, the 1.0 is not playable in multiplayer (you can create
On 04/26/2011 11:53 AM, James Westby wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:23:52 +0100, John Rowland Lenton
john.len...@canonical.com wrote:
* if our projects switch to, say, python 4, then we'd be looking at
shipping python 4 to all supported ubuntus, including LTS'es.
I can see why you would
