Which is the recommended way to build my own kernel from kernel.org
source on ubuntu? I need header, kernel+modules and occasionally debug
symbols.
The web is full of documentation about make-kpkg. There are a couple
of wiki pages for ubuntu that document how to rebuild the ubuntu
package for the
Hello Christoph,
Christoph Mathys [2012-01-06 9:29 +0100]:
Which is the recommended way to build my own kernel from kernel.org
source on ubuntu? I need header, kernel+modules and occasionally debug
symbols.
If you just need an upstream kernel, you can use
Hi Martin
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
If you just need an upstream kernel, you can use
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/
I fear I need a custom configuration and the preempt rt patchset
applied, and the kernel is supposed to
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
start button thing). Some of the things that drew me to Natty have
gone.
It's not the first time that
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh james.r.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
majority opinion, as far as I
On 5 January 2012 20:41, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Are you really plan to release ubuntu 12.04 without gnome 3.4 in the
official repository?
I mean, I can understand you prefere unity as default, but IMAO ubuntu
should provide the latest gnome, like it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:41:21 +
James Haigh james.r.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less
On 6 January 2012 10:41, James Haigh james.r.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
start button thing). Some of the
On 06/01/12 15:58, Evan Huus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haighjames.r.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the
Though I think Unity still needs a -lot- of work, I find it much more
usable in Oneiric than it was in Natty. I used it for several months
before switching to Gnome 3 in Oneiric, whereas I couldn't stand it for a
day in Natty. (Keep up the good work.) I can't speak to whether there
have been
Dear Jeremy I know ubuntu takes only 3.2 kernel when 3.3 is out, but there is
a main differences between kernel and gnome:
the major kernel bugs are backported into the older releases, with a SRU in 3.2
release cycle, so you don't have to worry about updates.
In gnome things are quite
11 matches
Mail list logo
