Hi folks,
I'm just packaging some library to various deb distros using
pbuilder + git-buildpackage.
Unfortunately, the .so's loose the +x flag in the package
(while usual 'make install' is okay) - it seems that some of the
dh stuff drops that flag :(
maybe some of you guys might have an idea ?
Hello Enrico,
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult [2015-01-02 16:52 +0100]:
Unfortunately, the .so's loose the +x flag in the package
(while usual 'make install' is okay) - it seems that some of the
dh stuff drops that flag :(
Yes, man dh_fixperms. Shared libraries don't need to and should not
On 02.01.2015 17:08, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi,
Yes, man dh_fixperms. Shared libraries don't need to and should not be
executable.
Oh, wasn't aware of that. Just used to that as gcc sets that flag.
Is it a bug in gcc, or are there platforms where +x is required ?
cu
--
Enrico Weigelt,
metux IT
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 06:16:17PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
On 02.01.2015 17:08, Martin Pitt wrote:
Yes, man dh_fixperms. Shared libraries don't need to and should not be
executable.
Oh, wasn't aware of that. Just used to that as gcc sets that flag.
Is it a bug in
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 18:16 +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
On 02.01.2015 17:08, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi,
Yes, man dh_fixperms. Shared libraries don't need to and should not be
executable.
Oh, wasn't aware of that. Just used to that as gcc sets that flag.
Is it a bug in