> well developed as-is.
>
>You are kidding, right? It amazes me that someone would say such a
>thing. I can tell you right now that the competition (Apple, and, yes,
>even Microsoft) do not have this attitude. While Ubuntu in its current
>form is a great distribution, it is by no means perfect and
Nowadays Ubuntu has to support 4 releases at a time (8.04,8.10,9.04 and
9.10) and as result of that some issues aren't solved as quickly as it
could. Having a LTS (Desktop and Server) with periodical releases and a
Ubuntu for human beans ;) could be interesting.
Is it still necessary to even have
> After an upgrade of my dual core AMD 4050e machine to Karmic, the
> second core is no longer seen (/proc/cpuinfo shows only one CPU). I
> have never seen this issue with Jaunty.
I recently bought an eMachines desktop with an Athlon X2 5050e dual core
processor. I installed Ubuntu 64bit (9.10
>At this point I
> think Google's approach with ChromeOS is something interesting. There
> are not different versions of ChromeOS. If you have ChromeOS installed
> you will always have the latest software installed.
I think google's approach is a terrible idea, as I hate the intrusivness of
aut
