On Tue Jan 15 15:41:30 2008, Scott James Remnant wrote: | On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:38 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: | | I outlined in my specification[1] how gThumb is more [memory] | | efficent and takes up less [disk or CDROM] space. | | | | [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default | | We feel the opposite, that f-spot has a better user experience.
I agree with Mr. Remnant: F-Spot is beautiful and simple like, for example, Microsoft Vista. But I don't think a pretty face should distract us from considering Mr. Quigley's points: F-Spot is inefficent and may violate Microsoft's patents. Ubuntu users deserve beautiful things and they don't deserve to have them taken away because we ignored potential patent violations. Thanks, -Dave -- David A. Harding Website: http://dtrt.org/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber/XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Calendar: http://dtrt.org/calendar/ -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss