Re: Removal of PulseAudio from Ubuntu

2010-05-12 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:06:10AM CEST, Shentino wrote: Also, I question the wisdom of having audio specific bluetooth support. My hunches tell me that a proper bluetooth support layer would be better. What do you mean

Re: Removal of PulseAudio from Ubuntu

2010-05-07 Thread Flávio Etrusco
would I file a bug for alsa-driver when alsa is the driver that is working. Pulse is what I'm having issues with. Perhaps you misread/misunderstood my post. I had this conversation with Daniel in pvt. Well, with a somewhat different words  ;-) On May 6, 2010 8:52 PM, Flávio Etrusco

Re: too long sleep delay of the screen by default

2010-04-16 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote: Op zondag 11-04-2010 om 11:12 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jérôme Bouat: Nowadays are the screens mostly lcd/led with fast resume. Turning on an LCD screen that's connected with an analog cable might take several seconds to

Re: too many virtual terminals by defaut

2010-03-31 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Jérôme Bouat jerome.bo...@wanadoo.fr wrote: On one side, if you want to use many virtual terminals, then it means that you have enough skills to configure additionnal terminals. On the other side, if you are a newbie, you will possibly never use a virtual

Re: too many virtual terminals by defaut

2010-03-31 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote: Jérôme Bouat wrote: Hello, I think that only 2 virtual terminals instead of 6 would be enough. I understand that most of the memory of the virtual terminals is shared. However, it would decrease the number of processes (more

Re: lucid and 2.6.33?

2010-03-25 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Patrick Goetz pgo...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: Subject: Re: lucid and 2.6.33? From: Jonathon Fernyhough j.fernyho...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:34:20 + As far as I am aware the important bits of .33 are being integrated into the special sauce for

Re: Trouble with 32 bit Gtk app on 64 bit system - no or misleading error msgs

2010-03-16 Thread Flávio Etrusco
Exacty. That's precicely my point. Fedora, Mandriva and openSUSE have thsi down. Which has nothing to do with rpm versus deb. It just happens that their repo layout/structure was much more conducive to packaging properly for 64-bit. IIRC rpm allows installing multiple versions of one

Re: Lots of Kernel related brakage in Lucid (amd64)

2010-03-15 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Danny Piccirillo danny.picciri...@ubuntu.com wrote: Damn, ran into this too, but i don't have an old kernel to fall back on. Is there a way i can fix this without having to reinstall? You could try disabling kernel modesetting: While booting, enter the grub

Re: if my disks start spinning wildly i wanna know whats causing it

2010-02-08 Thread Flávio Etrusco
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi.. I got a feature request for system monitor for you: Please add the ability to view disk-activity/second per program running per mountpoint. Don't forget to include system-level processes. Very occasionally my

Re: Backup application in default install

2010-01-27 Thread Flávio Etrusco
+1. Even a manual backup utility would suffice to me ;) Is there a bug entry for this? Best regards, Flávio On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Caleb Marcus caleb.marcus+u-...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, yes, yes. I fully agree. Currently I use an anacron job running rdiff-backup, but this is CLEARLY