On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:06:10AM CEST, Shentino wrote:
>> Also, I question the wisdom of having audio specific bluetooth support.
>>
>> My hunches tell me that a proper bluetooth support layer would be better.
>
> What do you mean by proper
>>binary) package?
> >>
>
> Why on earth would I file a bug for alsa-driver when alsa is the driver that
> is working. Pulse is what I'm having issues with. Perhaps you
> misread/misunderstood my post.
I had this conversation with Daniel in pvt. Well, with a so
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op zondag 11-04-2010 om 11:12 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jérôme
> Bouat:
>> Nowadays are the screens mostly lcd/led with fast resume.
>
> Turning on an LCD screen that's connected with an analog cable might
> take several seconds to "settle".
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Jérôme Bouat wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I think that only 2 virtual terminals instead of 6 would be enough.
>>
>> I understand that most of the memory of the virtual terminals is shared.
>> However, it would decrease the number of processes (mor
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Jérôme Bouat wrote:
> On one side, if you want to use many virtual terminals, then it means
> that you have enough skills to configure additionnal terminals.
>
> On the other side, if you are a newbie, you will possibly never use a
> virtual terminal.
>
> Thus I th
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Patrick Goetz wrote:
>>
>> Subject: Re: lucid and 2.6.33?
>> From: Jonathon Fernyhough
>> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:34:20 +
>>
>> As far as I am aware the important bits of .33 are being integrated
>> into the special sauce for the Lucid .32 kernel.
>>
>
> Per
>>
>> Exacty. That's precicely my point. Fedora, Mandriva and openSUSE have
>> thsi down.
>
> Which has nothing to do with rpm versus deb. It just happens that their
> repo layout/structure was much more conducive to packaging properly for
> 64-bit.
>
IIRC rpm allows installing multiple versions
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Danny Piccirillo
wrote:
> Damn, ran into this too, but i don't have an old kernel to fall back on. Is
> there a way i can fix this without having to reinstall?
>
You could try disabling kernel modesetting:
While booting, enter the grub menu (hold the Shift key. If
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Rene Veerman wrote:
> Hi..
>
> I got a feature request for "system monitor" for you:
>
> Please add the ability to view disk-activity/second per program
> running per mountpoint.
> Don't forget to include system-level processes.
>
> Very occasionally my disks start
+1.
Even a manual backup utility would suffice to me ;)
Is there a bug entry for this?
Best regards,
Flávio
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Caleb Marcus
wrote:
> Yes, yes, yes. I fully agree.
> Currently I use an anacron job running rdiff-backup, but this is CLEARLY not
> right for non-techie
10 matches
Mail list logo
