rsion. Since backwards
compatibility should be a given, I don't see why there coudn't be a
versionless symlink.
2010/8/17 Martin Pitt :
> Hello Leandro,
>
> Leandro de Oliveira [2010-08-16 15:29 -0300]:
>> The main issue is that a symlink named libbluetooth.so is required for
&g
Hi,
I've filed a question that was transformed into a bug was redirected
for discussion in some mailing list. I'm guessing this is the right
one.
Here is a direct link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/615504
The main issue is that a symlink named libbluetooth.so is required for
bluecove to
