On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 13:52 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Martin, please could you advice a server or link some web page with a
> list of server?
Sure.
All I had to do (unfortunately, I cannot find the original link right
now) was entering
cn.scs.msg.yahoo.com
into the "Page Server" field ("
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 00:19 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> >From the appcenter wiki page:
>
> "If Linux has an Achilles heel, from the point of view of a Windows
> user, it's installing new software. Be prepared to enter a new world in
> which Windows Update is a model of simplicity by compariso
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 12:08 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 June 2009 11:54:27 am Adrian Perez wrote:
> > There's any chance or prospect to integrating the new Yahoo! protocol
> > support present in new upstream Pidgin 2.5.7 into jaunty-updates or
> > maybe jaunty-proposed-updates?
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:39 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that upstream is so active, but a usable version will
> have to land very soon in order for the small band of Karmic testers to
> give it enough use to clear out all the bugs that will come from a large
> number of Ubuntu
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:24 +0200, Remco wrote:
...
> Downgrade
> conversion is probably not feasible for any but the most popular
> packages.
I completely agree with your message. Of course, expecting every package
to provide a downgrade converter is unrealistic. On the other hand, how
often do p
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:55 -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
...
> While I don't know how this _could_ be done, I agree that there are good
> reasons why it _should_. My particular pet peeve are the screensaver
> packages, where there are some screensavers that I want removed because
> they don't act
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 15:56 +0100, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
...
> How can this be rare if the user is supposed to test things after the
> upgrade? I didn't think about it but it's actually risky - every
> application can potentially be non-forward-compatible. Users should be
> adviced to use the
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:24 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
...
> On Monday 16 March 2009 10:58:55 Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
...
> > The request to change the icon came originally from various OEMs we
> > cooperate with
>
> So OEMs now count more then Community?
> Thanks, that was exactly what
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:29 +, Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
> Nicolò Chieffo wrote:
> > quote from the blog:
> > "A couple of people have said that the menu looks “sparse” or “bare”
...
> The "less is more" philosophy is neither new, nor obsolete. I personally
> believe that "less" and "more" can co
On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 11:47 +0100, Mario Vukelic wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 16:19 +, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> > To address the actual point, security of files on removable media can
> > only be handled at the hardware level, by making sure bad people don't
> > steal your disks. Bad guys can
10 matches
Mail list logo
