Re: Ubuntu iso

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 07:14, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am remastering the DVD. No issues there. > > Is there a way to remove the /pool directory on the ISO? > When I do that, remaster, and use the iso to boot, I get errors - about > not finding packages. > > I "desire" to install "everything" over

Re: 23.04: desktop iso peculiarity compared to the live-server one

On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 13:59, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 11:38, Adam Vodopjan > wrote: > >> Mby you're the correct person to report another issue with install images. >> Since 21.04 the boot/grub/loopback.c

Re: 23.04: desktop iso peculiarity compared to the live-server one

On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 11:38, Adam Vodopjan wrote: > Mby you're the correct person to report another issue with install images. > Since 21.04 the boot/grub/loopback.cfg in live-server is broken: the > 'iso-scan/filename=' piece is gone. > Argh that was an unintended consequence of removing

Re: 23.04: desktop iso peculiarity compared to the live-server one

On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 10:24, Adam Vodopjan wrote: > > THE QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK, is: was it intentional to not set the default > layer in initrd in the desktop iso case? > > I don't think we ever got around to discussing it properly. I think the desktop ISO should be changed to do things the

Re: Building initrd for custom ISO

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 03:06, Renato Botelho do Couto wrote: > I'm working implementing support for a hardware that requires one kernel > change to have console working. I already built a custom kernel that > solves the problem and have console working. > > Now next step is to build a custom

Re: Release vmlinuz and initrd alongside iso

Hi, On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 02:19, MonkZ wrote: > Hi, > > currently enabling booting via ipxe (https://ipxe.org/) over http needs > a dedicated mirror that has vmlinuz and initrd extracted from the iso. > > Would it be possible to release those files - already extracted from the > iso - alongside

Re: Impact of removing ubuntu-server metapackage

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 10:55, Matthew Smith wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a handful of applications that will run on a ubuntu 20.04 server > install. I want to be able to manage core files that could be generated if > any of those applications crash using systemd-coredump. I noticed that when > I

Re: autoinstall network question

On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 02:23, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 7:42 AM Jerry Geis wrote: > >> On my boot line for append I have biosdevname=0 net.ifnames=0 (using >> 20.04 LTS). >> append initrd=/casper/initrd debian-installer/local=en_US autoinstall >> ds=nocloud;s=/cdrom/

Re: Disable File Checking Boot Parameter

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 01:27, wrote: > Hello > > I need to boot a Ubuntu LiveUSB multiple times a day. Each time, I have > to remove the "maybe-ubiquity" from the kernel parameters and the side > effect is that I would not be able to skip the .deb files check which > lasted quite long for each

Re: installation kit modified during installation

On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 01:25, Doru Georgescu wrote: > Short version: > > Byte 480 of the Ubuntu desktop 20.04.1 LTS installation kit has been > modified during installation. Is this by design? > Yes, the logs of the installation process are now written to the USB stick by default. I guess the

Re: pam 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.2 packaging issue

On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 06:39, Arnold Czeman (aczeman) < arnold.cze...@oneidentity.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a little problem with the newest version of pam source package on > Bionic. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.2/ > I would like to import to a git

Re: Just some observations on first time install of 18.10

On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 10:45, Jim Pye wrote: > All > > Not bugs, but some observations on the new installer of Ubuntu 18.10 Server > > Using .iso in a VirtualBox VM on a Mac > > Not sure of the etiquette of attaching screen shots, but have them if > needed. > > 1. Getting to step 7 of 11 in the

Re: libv8-3.14-dev

On 18 May 2018 at 21:58, jaroslav.svoboda wrote: > Hi, > > is there a reason why libv8-3.14-dev and libv8-3.14 packages are not > available for arm64 (particularly in Bionic)? I read there was an issue few > years ago when V8 did not recognized ARMv8 but that

Re: Golang Package.

It's up to date in Bionic. If you want a newer release in an older Ubuntu, there is this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~gophers/+archive/ubuntu/archive or you can use the snap (snap install --classic --channel 1.10/stable go). Cheers, mwh On 22 February 2018 at 11:36, Mike Lloyd

Re: git workflows for general Ubuntu development

On 15 November 2016 at 01:51, Robie Basak wrote: > On the server team, we've been working on a process that uses git to do > our "Ubuntu merges". As a consequence, we now have a mechanism that can > import package histories into git on Launchpad. We think that this work >

Re: [PATCH] Please fix squid3 bug #3769 and squid3 trusty package bug 1405351 in trusty

Hi, thanks! I've reformatted the patch and put it in my PPA. Could you please fill out the test case and regression potential sections of the bug report? I don't know enough about squid3 to do that. Cheers, mwh On 24 March 2016 at 03:21, Lukas Erlacher wrote: > Hi, > > there