mdadm bugs 946758 and 946344 (was: Re: Private bugs - mdadm)

2012-07-03 Thread Tim Frost
Dmitrijs, On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:35 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: On 02/07/12 12:25, Tim Frost wrote: I am one of a number of people affected by an apparent bug in mdadm. The official master bug in launchpad is marked as private - #946758 [trimmed] Automatically filed bugs via apport

Private bugs - mdadm

2012-07-02 Thread Tim Frost
that there are reasons for protecting sensitive data, but there should be a way of creating a master bug record in Launchpad that has the data needed to track the issue, without exposing any sensitive data. Tim -- Tim Frost timfr...@xtra.co.nz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Correct package to file bug against for the text installer

2011-09-13 Thread Tim Frost
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:03 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:16:50PM +1200, Tim Frost wrote: I have downloaded the ISO images for the ubuntu oneiric beta 1, and burnt them to CDRW media. Running the cdrom upgrade using a CD created from the 64-bit alternate image gets

Correct package to file bug against for the text installer

2011-09-12 Thread Tim Frost
. MD5 checksums are all OK. The CD is identified in .disk/info as Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64 (20110901) I successfully upgraded a server, using a CDRW written using the 64-bit ubuntu server ISO. Tim -- Tim Frost timfr...@xtra.co.nz signature.asc Description

Re: dynamic executables ?

2009-04-23 Thread Tim Frost
on the contents of~/eagle-5.5.0/bin as reported, I assume that you used the linux installer)? In most cases,the assumption is that linux == 32-bit intel platform while there are distributions that support PPC and other platforms. Cheers, Al. Tim -- Tim Frost timfr...@xtra.co.nz -- Ubuntu