Re: Ubuntu development - joining...

2007-11-03 Thread Tim Hull
> The best approach is to search a project/issue that you are interested > in, which seems to be improving the laptop experience. There is also a > lengthy document from Andreas Lloyd which lots of contacts: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ContributeToUbuntu Thanks for the info. The Ubuntu membership

Ubuntu development - joining...

2007-11-03 Thread Tim Hull
Hi, I have been generally lurking around Ubuntu development for several months now (since about the Feisty release), and previously had done the same around the Warty/Hoary time period. Though I have found Ubuntu to be superior to other Linux distributions (save for maybe Debian, except that it d

Re: Non-"critical" bug fixes/new hardware drivers in stable releases?

2007-08-31 Thread Tim Hull
> > > > > Backporting changes is risky. Ubuntu makes the decision that security > > fixes are worth the risk of backporting. If you are talking about > > changes that are available in later releases, then the affected users > > are able to upgrade. In my opinion, it is more important that we don't

Non-"critical" bug fixes/new hardware drivers in stable releases?

2007-08-30 Thread Tim Hull
Hi, I've been lurking/occasionally posting here for a while, and I would like to bring up an issue that has been a real annoyance in my attempted use of Ubuntu (as well as other Linux distributions, notably Debian) this summer. In short, while I feel that Ubuntu has made real progress with regard

Re: Ubuntu development...

2007-08-25 Thread Tim Hull
On 8/25/07, Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Heya! > > Wow, that previous response was quite harsh - that was probably why it > was sent off-list. Just realized that. I'm still unsure which key components you want to change, or how yo

Re: Ubuntu development...

2007-08-25 Thread Tim Hull
> > The fact that you submit bug reports and do not follow up / patch them > yourself > shows a severe disinterest in *really* helping ubuntu and (like most > new devel's in all projects) just want to focus on the hot-dog stuff. I do follow up - in fact, I've often posted additional info on my bu

Ubuntu development...

2007-08-24 Thread Tim Hull
Hi, (I know I may have brought up some of this before, but it was in the middle of a Tribe freeze and I wasn't exactly clear regarding what I had to say. Please excuse this...) I'm currently a senior at the University of Michigan, majoring in (what else) Computer Science, and I've been toying wit

Getting in touch with development teams...

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
ment done in house (i.e. physically) at Canonical offices? Could somebody fill me in on this? I'd like to help/offer suggestions on these issues directly with the teams involved. I've tried e-mailing a few people (in particular, those responsible for laptop issues and multimedia)

Re: Updates post-release/freeze

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Hull
> > > This all takes more resources. In Universe and Backports both we do not > have > sufficient communicty involvement to support the current demand. IMO any > proposal for more $STUFF that isn't paid for should also have some > thoughts > about where the labor to do the work is going to come f

Updates post-release/freeze

2007-07-30 Thread Tim Hull
I know my last thread was confusing to some developers with regards to my desire for a greater availability of updates post-release. I thought I'd clarify - I'm not primarily thinking of LTS releases, and I'm not suggesting that a large number of supported components be version-updated between re

Re: Updating software between releases - where backports/SRU isn't enough

2007-07-28 Thread Tim Hull
> > > I run a current stable machine as my workstation, so at the moment it's > running Feisty. For me that's fine, I can update, compile, fix, etc. but > I would never expect my users to do that. In terms of time spent > maintaining it, I've upgraded from Dapper to Edgy, then from Edgy to > Feisty

Re: Updating software between releases - where backports/SRU isn't enough

2007-07-28 Thread Tim Hull
> > > For LTS releases I agree this is a problem. I also think Ubuntu is > addressing > it in a sane way. Most of the changes included in the upcoming 6.06.2 are > related to supporting newer hardware. My launchpad-foo isn't up to > providing > a link, but you can find a link of bugs that are ta

Updating software between releases - where backports/SRU isn't enough

2007-07-28 Thread Tim Hull
I thought I'd bring up an issue that I see with Ubuntu - and most Linux distributions as a whole.Anyway, the issue is that once a release is declared "stable", there are no more updates beyond security updates available - at least without resorting to ugly tarballs or random unofficial package repo

Getting involved in Ubuntu development/testing...

2007-07-16 Thread Tim Hull
For the past several years, I have dabbled in Linux/GNU/open source/free software, starting in 1999 when I managed my first Linux install, which was Debian 2.0 (now THAT was dependency hell - no apt back then). Since then, I have always been partial to the "Debian way" of doing things, as compare