being mounted r/w. In the
(hopefully rare) case you find some issue you'd have to ask the user
to take action, i.e. reboot the machine.
Exactly!
Regards,
Waldemar Kornewald
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https
correctly or not at all.
Regards,
Waldemar Kornewald
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
electronic devices in
standby mode!
Regards,
Waldemar Kornewald
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
for everyone: turn fsck off by default or make it
work in the background.
Regards,
Waldemar Kornewald
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 9/27/07, Erik Andrén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/27, Waldemar Kornewald [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
--
Are there any alternatives? Here are two examples:
Use SMART (AFAIK, Vista does that).
SMART is hardware- and not filesystem dependent.
Besides, the implementation of SMART
-source world
(it's only a small, but important step towards better usability).
Ideally, we'd only be presented with *essential* choice and then have
something like a search interface for getting a list of options for
*anything* when we want that choice.
Regards,
Waldemar Kornewald
--
Ubuntu-devel
Was my mail cut in the middle?
On 9/27/07, Waldemar Kornewald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, (resending... why do mails not get to the ML, automatically?)
On 9/27/07, Dominik Wagenfuehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: And yes, I know that you can deactivate Compiz with a few clicks,
but why do
On 9/27/07, Luke Yelavich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:03:32PM EST, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
Isn't a hardware defect the main reason a file system can be corrupted
without a crash? There can be serious FS bugs, but aren't those very
rare, anyway? What else could lead
Hi,
On 9/27/07, Oliver Grawert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 27.09.2007, 10:49 +0200 schrieb Waldemar Kornewald:
What about my alternative suggestion? It would still run fsck, but at
the same time be less annoying or not disturbing at all.
not wsure if you ever ran fsck
