It is not OK.
Says who? You're speaking as if from a position of authority, but what
authority do you have?
On 2017-06-23 19:52, Nrbrtx wrote:
Dear Ubuntu developers!
I can't understand how this happen, but your latest kernel upgrade
broke many user-space applications.
For me this process
I'm listening to your responses, and responding myself.
You call me a spammer.
Which is a libel.
Would you like me to file over it?
On 2017-06-15 16:05, Wade Smart wrote:
Whoever this person is, not only is s/he spamming multiple lists here,
there are several over lists where Im getting the
Nice vally-girl yawn.
Because you are not interested in legal matters vis a vis GRSecurity, no
one should be and the discussion should be censored
You're a real piece of work, you know.
A real piece of work.
So I ask the question again: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of
GRSecurity
Oh exaulted one, I am so sorry to have wasted your inbox space.
You see we all live for you, exalted aryan queen!
Some of us care about the legal aspects of "copyleft".
Without enforcement there is no reason for anyone to contribute to
linux.
There is a simple trade: we trade our labor for
their customer restriction "you can redistribute
this code, but if you do we will on longer provide you
with updates" does not change that.
That is the imposition of an additional term, a court would not be
amused by the programmers claim it's fine because he didn't ink it into
the copy of
If Mr Spengler would like to market a non-re-distributable hardened
kernel, he can write his own kernel from scratch. Currently he is
marketing a non-redistributable derivative work of the Linux Kernel. He
prevents customers of his from redistributing the derivative work by
threatening a
Also Brad Spengler has been threatening legal action against an openwall
developer back-porting features of Brad's wholly, non-standalone,
derivative work.
He also calls GRSecurity an "Original Work", which it is not (see the
Anime Subs cases for the court's opinion) (GRSecurity is such a
