On Feb 4, 2008 5:34 PM, Bryan Quigley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > why not include [Firefox 3 Beta] by default early on to get more
> > > > testing?
> > >
> > > Indeed +1
> >
> > Or not
> > Many addons are still not compatible
> >
> So? This would help bring the ones included in Ub
> > > why not include it by default early
> > > on to get more testing?
> >
> > Indeed +1
>
> Or not
> Many addons are still not compatible
So? This would help bring the ones included in Ubuntu that aren't
compatable up to the light. Plus, these are development builds. Things are
allowe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 January 2008 08:15:05 Patrice Vetsel wrote:
> Le Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:21:25 -0500,
> "Bryan Quigley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > why not include it by default early
> > on to get more testing?
>
> Indeed +1
Or not
Many addons
Le Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:21:25 -0500,
"Bryan Quigley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> why not include it by default early
> on to get more testing?
Indeed +1
--
Patrice Vetsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aka/Alias Kagou
https://launchpad.net/people/vetsel-patrice
gpg key: 0x15c094db
signature.asc
Des
When is Firefox 3 (Beta) going to be in the default hardy install? We plan
on shipping Firefox 3, so why not include it by default early on to get more
testing?
Thanks,
Bryan
On Jan 25, 2008 11:47 AM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ubuntu developers,
>
> The expected release d
