Re: Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-25 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On 25/09/2007 Milan wrote: > And then, before adding a repository, it should print : - > the number of packages the repository provides and - the list of > installed or main packages that may be replaced automatically. Using for > example two dialogs, you would need to click twice on 'Next' to inst

Re: Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-25 Thread Milan
Vincenzo Ciancia a écrit : > Adding a way for people to provide user-friendly apt sources without > having to upload screenshots on how to add sources in > "system/administration/sources" (whatever it is called in english) does > not change the overall security model of ubuntu and apt, which is, if

Re: Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-25 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
On 25/09/2007 Wouter Stomp wrote: > > > How is this different from providing links to .deb packages? Users > > > unaware about architectures et al are not really capable to > > > understand comments next to the link either. If they are, you can do > > > the same for apturl links. > > > > > The use

Re: Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-25 Thread Wouter Stomp
On 9/18/07, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote: > > 1. It's possible to run arbitrary scripts in the preinst/postrm phase > > of dpkg installation or the installed program itself could be > > malicious. By allowing the repository

Re: Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-18 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:25:00PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > 2. Repositories added through apturl could provide packages included > > in Ubuntu but with higher version numbers with malicious code. > > ... this is a feature, not an issue. I'm really not convinced by that. We shouldn't be m

Re: Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-18 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote: > 1. It's possible to run arbitrary scripts in the preinst/postrm phase > of dpkg installation or the installed program itself could be > malicious. By allowing the repository to be specified the deb can come > from anywhere. So, you've

Apturl (security) issues and inclusion in Gutsy

2007-09-17 Thread Wouter Stomp
Hello, I would like to discuss the recent inclusion of apturl in the Gutsy default installation. The idea of apturl is great but the current implementation has a lot of issues, some of which I will list here: 1. It's possible to run arbitrary scripts in the preinst/postrm phase of dpkg installati