I finally made the sources built correctly.
First I used the Intrepid sources instead of the debian sources.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/subversion/1.5.0dfsg1-1ubuntu2
But this was not the problem.
As you said correctly, the problem was that the headers of the nested
Hello,
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 32 bit.
I try to package subversion 1.5.0 with JavaHL support.
Therefore I use these debian experimental sources:
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/subversion
When I build the package using:
tar xzf subversion_1.5.0dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
cd subversion-1.5.0dfsg1
Those look like fairly benign warnings that could be ignored. I'm not too
familiar with debuild, but you could try running it with the -W option.
That might set it to ignore warnings.
On Fri, June 27, 2008 1:33 pm, Benno Korn wrote:
Hello,
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 32 bit.
I try to package
But there is also this error in line 42.
I am currently trying it with the -W option.
What were the options the Ubuntu developers have built the subversion
1.4.6 package with?
Can this information be obtained somewhere?
Or what other build command should be used (cause you said you were not
Sorry, missed the problem with all of the extra long lines :)
It looks like the problem is it is missing the file
org_tigris_subversion_javahl_ConflictDescriptor_Action.h, probably because
something went wrong building javahl. I'm compiling it now to see if I
can figure out why...
On Fri, June
Ok. Thank you.
I asked in subversion IRC channels and mailing lists, but no one had a
clue where the problem is.
Then I decided that when someone knows how to compile it then these
people who compiled the package
in the repositories.
And now I am asking here ;-)
Jason Crain schrieb:
Sorry,
Yes, I found a gentoo bug report where also the nested classes were the
problem.
But I do not know where to insert that code.
In debian/rules is useless because at that time the .class files have
not been compiled.
Also that the headers of _all_ nested classes are created.
Jason Crain
I have found a gentoo bug report that describes the problem.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219959
I wonder that the bug should have been fixed in rc5.
Jason Crain schrieb:
It first compiles the .java files using javac, then creates header
files using javah. It skips several header
