ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com wrote:
From: John Moser
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: File systems
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
--
Interesting. But even after reading all that, I'm still
ready.
To its merit, btrfs is also trying to be a decent stand-alone
filesystem, and offers features like built-in compression etc etc.
When it's mature (i.e. has non-broken fsck), it'll probably hold
together better on technical merit than old-generation file systems.
ext4 is a litt
Hi Oli,
Oliver Grawert [2006-12-12 11:11 +0100]:
> > - Non-admins will see icons for fixed hard disk partitions, too,
> >although they cannot mount them. This is because the visibility of
> >those are determined by hal, so they are global. If it's too
> >annoying, I can patch gnome-vf
Hi,
Ernst Persson [2006-12-12 12:46 +0100]:
> But wait, what's this then?
>
> http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=commit;h=2ea340399bf8cf3d2bb6bd1b5c4ecbc2042e93d4
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2006-October/006308.html
>
> Seems David Zeuthen from RedHat has already worke
Hi martin,
> gksu verifies that you are an admin and gets the necessary root
> privilege for the mounting. If you are not in the 'admin' group, then
> you cannot mount local hard disks.
I tested this new feature on my fresh feisty install and it works great.
Nevertheless, when i tried to mount a
Martin Pitt wrote:
> as specified for feisty [1] we want to handle spare fixed hard disk
> partitions in a similarly easy way as we handle removable drives.
> [...]
>
> I welcome any testing feedback (to ubuntu-devel-discuss@ or as bug
> reports against gnome-mount or hal).
It works as expected.
Hi,
(moving to -discuss)
Phillip Susi [2006-12-13 17:15 -0500]:
> What about partitions that are flagged as user mountable in fstab? What
> about partitions that are not listed in /etc/fstab at all?
hal only ignores partitions that are marked as 'auto' in fstab. If
they are not mounted when
